2025-12-20 15:17:39

In contract trading, the most heartbreaking thing has never been just losing money, but the feeling of being inexplicably judged dead by the system. You haven't even truly touched the liquidation line, and with a sudden market fluctuation, you're forcibly liquidated in an instant—what's behind this? Price manipulation, liquidity withdrawal, slippage attacks—after a series of combined tactics, retail traders simply can't react in time.

Some exchanges are beginning to optimize these rules. For example, they introduce 100x leverage but improve the liquidation algorithm to reduce irrational liquidations caused by sudden liquidity shortages. What does this mean? If your market direction judgment is correct, you'll have more chances to survive, rather than being cut down by technical details. At the same time, risk management granularity can be more refined—you can better control your risk exposure.

Such innovative mechanisms are worth paying attention to, especially for traders who want to use high leverage but also want to protect themselves. After all, the true success or failure in trading should be based on market direction judgment, not on the system rules of the exchange.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MoonWaterDroplets

· 2025-12-23 04:26

It's the same old long wick candle routine, really annoying. Wait, the exchange is optimizing the get liquidated algorithm by itself? Is this for real? If the direction is right, can I survive? Then how did I die before, haha. But to be honest, compared to being closed position for no reason, I still prefer a relatively fair rule. 100x leverage sounds great, but in the end, it's still gambling; let's not kid ourselves. The system rules strangling retail investors really need to be reflected upon.

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 2025-12-22 01:53

I've suffered losses from this pinning trick as well, but to be honest, what really determines life and death is still your own stop-loss settings. The exchange's optimization of the liquidation algorithm is just a bonus. 100 times leverage with improved algorithms sounds tempting, but looking at historical data, the frequency of liquidation events for high-leverage products hasn't significantly decreased. Don't be fooled by marketing. The key moment when liquidity dries up is one you simply can't escape from; even if the technical analysis points in the right direction, it doesn't matter. That's the most painful part. This wave of mechanism innovation has indeed improved some detail issues, but fundamentally, the exchange is still in the business, and retail investors ultimately have to rely on their own risk management to make a living. When the market fluctuates, it feels like your positions are dancing on the edge of a knife; whether the system rules are optimized or not actually makes little difference.

View OriginalReply0

StakeWhisperer

· 2025-12-20 15:40

I think this explanation is still too idealistic. Exchange improves algorithms? Ha, in the end, it's still the sheep paying for the wolf. Liquidity exhaustion is impossible; as long as you open high leverage, you can never escape the fate of being eaten. What sounds nice is "more opportunities to survive," but in reality, it's just a new way to harvest the leek. 100x leverage? I advise you not to touch it; this stuff is just poison. Even with the right direction, you won't last long; technical details are the real slaughtering blade.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureCollector

· 2025-12-20 15:39

It's the same old trick, I've seen through it long ago. The moment the needle was inserted, I was instantly numb; there's no way to dodge it. Exchanges changing algorithms? Ha, let's believe it when we see it. Even if the direction is right, it's useless; the system will still screw you over. 100x leverage sounds tempting, but is risk control really reliable? It sounds nice, but ultimately, you still have to watch out for the exchange. This is the darkest part of contracts, more frustrating than losing money.

View OriginalReply0

MindsetExpander

· 2025-12-20 15:25

It's the old trick of being drained and bloodied again, basically the exchange's way of bloodsucking. But I still favor platforms that improve the liquidation mechanism; at least there's a chance to survive. High leverage is essentially gambling; don't expect the platform to save you. Liquidity exhaustion is really disgusting; retail investors have nothing to compete with the system. To put it nicely, it's innovation; I think it's just another way to harvest retail investors.

View OriginalReply0