The perspective of the Hyperliquid ecosystem is worth paying attention to: financial infrastructure must maintain trustworthiness and neutrality. What does this mean? Simply put, three "no's" — no involvement of private capital parties in control, no special market maker benefit arrangements, and no protocol fees flowing to any single company. This logic touches on the fundamental issue of DeFi: how decentralized finance can achieve sustainable development while ensuring transparency and fairness. As more on-chain protocols explore this path, it reflects the market's demand for truly open financial architectures.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RooftopReservervip
· 5h ago
Trustworthy neutrality is back again, sounds good, but how many actually achieve it? Most are still just pursuing funding to realize their dreams.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfessionvip
· 5h ago
It's the same old rhetoric of the "trustworthy and neutral" utopia... Sounds nice, but who has actually achieved it? Hyperliquid claims this, but isn't there still backing from capital interests behind it? It feels like DeFi has been just shouting slogans these past few years; how much has actually been implemented? "Trustworthy and neutral" sounds very appealing, but who gets to define "neutral"? Isn't it just the group with the most influence over the discourse? Wait, if the issue of fee flow has been resolved, how can the protocol be sustainable? That logical loop isn't complete. Honestly, compared to the idea of being trustworthy and neutral, I'm more concerned about Hyperliquid's TVL and trading volume... the data is what really matters.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrantvip
· 5h ago
Credible neutrality sounds great, but who will oversee its actual implementation?
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBustervip
· 5h ago
Credible neutrality sounds great, but I just want to ask who defines what "neutral" means? This theory is easy to talk about, but when it comes to actually implementing it... uh, that's tough.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHomelessvip
· 5h ago
Trustworthiness and neutrality sound good, but in reality, how many protocols have actually achieved this? Or are they just talk?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)