There's an interesting phenomenon: investing over $800 to invite an influential person on social media to promote a project, originally expecting her to become the growth engine of the project. But what happened? She posted one tweet and then disappeared without a trace. Later, when asked if she could be more active in the community, participate in discussions and interactions, the response was lukewarm. This situation is not uncommon in small coin communities—there's a huge gap between marketing investment and actual engagement. Sometimes, having a reputation does not equate to genuine community contribution, which is a lesson many project teams need to learn when choosing community ambassadors.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FrontRunFighter
· 23h ago
ngl, this is just classic influencer theater—they're extracting value like it's a sandwich attack. one tweet and ghost, textbook MEV extraction but for clout. the protocol's broken when you can pay $800 for a single block of visibility lmao
Reply0
MetaMasked
· 01-07 14:15
You want to buy loyalty with just 800 dollars? That's naive, buddy.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 01-05 22:20
$800 gone down the drain, this is the daily life of Web3, haha
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 01-05 02:55
Losing $800 in the water, this is the reality of the crypto world
---
KOLs are all one-way output machines, don't expect them to truly participate
---
Just tweet once and run, that's incredible
---
Famous people aren't necessarily reliable; it depends on actual actions
---
Everyone who has stepped on the landmine of choosing ambassadors knows
---
It seems small coins are the easiest to be exploited this way
---
Spending money to buy hype, and this is the result—awkward
---
True contributors have long been working hard in the community
---
If the response is lukewarm, just ignore it, where's the professionalism?
---
There are many such KOLs, all just wanting to cash out quickly
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 01-05 02:49
Want to buy a character design for just $800? The tricks to scam people in this circle are getting more and more straightforward.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 01-05 02:47
Buying loneliness for 800 dollars, this is the true nature of crypto marketing.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 01-05 02:46
$800 down the drain, this is the reality of the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 01-05 02:41
Spend $800 to get a tweet, this deal is really unbeatable haha
There's an interesting phenomenon: investing over $800 to invite an influential person on social media to promote a project, originally expecting her to become the growth engine of the project. But what happened? She posted one tweet and then disappeared without a trace. Later, when asked if she could be more active in the community, participate in discussions and interactions, the response was lukewarm. This situation is not uncommon in small coin communities—there's a huge gap between marketing investment and actual engagement. Sometimes, having a reputation does not equate to genuine community contribution, which is a lesson many project teams need to learn when choosing community ambassadors.