To talk about the hottest topic in the crypto world recently, nothing beats "scarcity." A single sentence hits the core—Bitcoin has a fixed total supply of 21 million, yet it watches helplessly as fiat currencies are repeatedly printed by the printing press.

Let's first look at Bitcoin. The underlying code has long established the supply rules beyond doubt: a fixed total supply that cannot be increased. This kind of mathematical-level scarcity is truly robust. Transparent, tamper-proof, with issuance strictly following a predetermined schedule, no institution can alter it. In simple terms, it replaces reliance on centralized trust with cryptography and consensus mechanisms.

Now, consider the fiat system. When the economy cools down, debts pile up, and liquidity tightens, what’s the solution? Simply turn on the printing press. In the short term, this can indeed ease pressure, but what about the long-term consequences? Continuous dilution of purchasing power, prices soaring wave after wave, and cash in hand gradually losing value. People's savings' actual purchasing power is silently eroded.

The underlying logic behind this contrast is straightforward: on one side is a rule-based, mathematically scarce world; on the other is a traditional system with human-controlled, elastic issuance. As global debt keeps rising and monetary policies frequently shift, more and more investors are turning to Bitcoin as a core hedge against traditional financial risks. It is becoming that "digital gold" supported by scarcity and consensus value, without relying on any institutional endorsement.

Ultimately, this is a collision of two monetary philosophies. One believes in the power of rules; the other trusts policy flexibility. The answer for the future may gradually emerge from this ongoing dialogue.