2026-01-05 03:27:25

True Web3 governance should put people at the center. Many decision failures are fundamentally due to the lack of consultation with those affected, and the absence of feedback or remedial channels for them. The communities that suffer the most are often those with the least voice—they don't even have mechanisms to oppose unjust decisions. What's even more painful is that some authorities often hide behind the banners of "public interest" or "risk prevention" to evade responsibility. True decentralized governance should not be like this.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-6bc33122

· 22h ago

That's true, but the reality is that most projects are still a one-man show, and the community is just a bunch of retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

RiddleMaster

· 01-07 16:20

That's correct, but the problem is that in Web3, the largest voices still belong to the big players, and small investors basically have no say.

View OriginalReply0

PermabullPete

· 01-06 04:41

That's right. Many projects nowadays are just using the name of DAO to promote oligarchy among major stakeholders, and the voices of the underlying community members are completely unheard.

View OriginalReply0

InscriptionGriller

· 01-05 03:56

Basically, it's just the old tricks of the authorities, changing the shell to continue the scam.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeNomad

· 01-05 03:52

ngl this hits different when you've watched governance exploits unfold in real time. seen too many protocols hide behind "risk management" while retail gets liquidated. the trust assumptions break down so fast when nobody's actually listening to affected parties.

Reply0

pumpamentalist