#2026年比特币行情展望 The first trading day of the new year saw a wave of strong capital inflows into crypto asset ETFs — with a single-day net inflow of $640 million.
The data is quite interesting: Bitcoin ETFs absorbed $470 million, with BlackRock's IBIT product alone accounting for $280 million, while Ethereum ETFs also saw inflows of $170 million.
Compared to that, how dramatic is this shift? Just two weeks ago, institutions were still rushing out — from November to December, a full two months, these products experienced a total redemption wave of $4.57 billion.
So the current situation is: the fastest at the end of the year, the most eager to buy at the start of the new year. This psychological game among institutional investors sounds a bit familiar, doesn’t it? The market is always repeating the same story — only the protagonists and numbers are changing.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaReckt
· 01-08 04:26
BlackRock, are they dumping the market or are they genuinely optimistic? Honestly, it's hard to tell.
---
45 billion redeemed, with a net inflow of 640 million. This move by the institutions is brilliant; their method of cutting leeks has upgraded.
---
Running away at the end of the year and taking over at the beginning of the new year—this cycle we've seen countless times, haven't we?
---
ibit alone holds 280 million? BlackRock really considers itself a cash machine.
---
Wait, two months of 45 billion redemptions and now a daily net inflow of 640 million—these numbers don't add up.
---
Here we go again, it's always the same routine. Wake up, everyone.
---
Institutional psychological game? Isn't it just about buying low and selling high? Don't make cutting leeks sound so noble.
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 01-06 20:11
BlackRock's move is really impressive. Spending 4.5 billion and then getting back 640 million, when will institutions get tired of this leek-cutting script?
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 01-05 10:38
Is BlackRock rushing to buy, truly optimistic or just setting a trap for retail investors?
---
4.57 billion dollars flowed out, then rushed back in. This move by the institutions is brilliant... I'll just see how long it can hold this time.
---
Basically, it's just the psychology of retail investors, repeating the same pattern with different dates—boring.
---
IBIT lost 280 million, it seems like big funds are all investing in it. Should I follow or wait for a pullback?
---
This rhythm is really amazing—dump at the end of the year, buy the dip at the beginning, retail investors are always a step behind.
---
Here we go again, I bet five dollars that they will start selling again in mid-January.
---
640 million sounds like a lot, but when spread globally, it’s nothing. Still, it’s somewhat interesting.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 01-05 10:38
Is BlackRock adding to their position or testing the waters? It seems like institutions love this kind of game.
BlackRock, is this bottom-feeding? Two months ago, they were aggressively dumping, and now they're buying like crazy. This script of harvesting profits from retail investors never fails.
View OriginalReply0
ChainProspector
· 01-05 10:26
BlackRock's move is really brilliant. Two weeks ago, they were dumping, and now they’ve absorbed 280 million. The true face of institutions...
---
With 4.57 billion sold, then turning around to buy back 640 million. This wave of cutting leeks is truly old-fashioned.
---
It’s always like this: panic selling at the end of the year, FOMO buying in the new year. We retail investors are just here to dance along.
---
ibit took in 280 million, and BlackRock really understands the market. Other products can only watch and sip the soup.
---
Catching this bottom wave means profit if you get in on time; if not, just keep waiting. No need to overthink.
---
Institutions are most aggressive when they are bearish, and also the harshest when they decide to act. That’s the difference with professional players.
---
They are so fierce on the first day of the new year. It feels a bit uncertain afterward; those who rise too quickly are prone to a reversal.
---
Ethereum also absorbed 170 million. It seems the institutions are really ready to bet on this round. To follow or not to follow?
---
The same story repeats, but this time the data is indeed different. What does it indicate?
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorking
· 01-05 10:22
BlackRock's move, no wonder Bitcoin looks so fierce
---
4.5 billion redeemed to 640 million net inflow, institutions are really playing with heartbeat
---
Here we go again? Cutting losses at the end of the year and picking up at the beginning, who will end up taking the final blow is still unknown
---
IBIT's 280 million, BlackRock is starving other ETFs to death
---
So it's just standard chasing the rise and killing the fall... just with a different name called "Institutional Game"
---
New year, new atmosphere, a new round of harvesting game begins
---
The data looks good, but I'm just worried it might be darkness before dawn again
#2026年比特币行情展望 The first trading day of the new year saw a wave of strong capital inflows into crypto asset ETFs — with a single-day net inflow of $640 million.
The data is quite interesting: Bitcoin ETFs absorbed $470 million, with BlackRock's IBIT product alone accounting for $280 million, while Ethereum ETFs also saw inflows of $170 million.
Compared to that, how dramatic is this shift? Just two weeks ago, institutions were still rushing out — from November to December, a full two months, these products experienced a total redemption wave of $4.57 billion.
So the current situation is: the fastest at the end of the year, the most eager to buy at the start of the new year. This psychological game among institutional investors sounds a bit familiar, doesn’t it? The market is always repeating the same story — only the protagonists and numbers are changing.