2026-01-05 10:20:23

I have been following the progress of projects in the AI track recently. To be honest, there are models with impressive technology everywhere, but the truly promising ones are those that can turn "intelligence" into a network—tracking contributions, enabling value settlement, and flowing profits back.

Some teams are building open AI infrastructure on the Base chain, which is quite an interesting approach. They break down resources like models, computing power, and data, no longer monopolized by large corporations, but instead allowing developers worldwide to participate in building. The core logic is clear: distribute rewards based on actual usage, with those who contribute more earning more.

If this model works out, it could change the distribution of the AI ecosystem. Moving from centralized to decentralized, from monopolies by giants to co-creation by developers, the incentive mechanism is key. It’s worth continuous observation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCrier

· 01-08 09:38

Bro, this incentive mechanism sounds great, but I'm worried it's just empty promises... Can these projects on Base really get a share of the money?

View OriginalReply0

fren_with_benefits

· 01-07 22:59

I'm just worried it will be another empty promise. These open infrastructure projects on the Base chain sound great, but the key is whether the real profits can be delivered on time.

View OriginalReply0

LoneValidator

· 01-05 10:49

I like the idea of breaking down computing power, but the key is whether the token economic model can be well-designed; otherwise, it becomes another form of disguised profit-taking.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-1a2ed0b9

· 01-05 10:48

Uh, I like the logic of this distributed AI on the Base chain, but I don't know who can really figure out the incentive mechanism.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoTherapist

· 01-05 10:48

ngl, this decentralization narrative hits different when you actually trace the psychological patterns... incentive mechanics are basically just trauma bonding with better tokenomics, right? 🧠

Reply0

MEVEye

· 01-05 10:44

Infrastructure is indeed the last blue ocean, but can these projects on Base really share the benefits, or is it just another round of empty hype?

View OriginalReply0

SerumSquirrel

· 01-05 10:39

Yeah, this logic is indeed correct. Decentralized incentives are much more reliable than simply stacking models. --- Can the Base chain system succeed? It still depends on whether it can truly activate the developer ecosystem. --- All talk sounds good, but the key is whether participants can make money, right? --- A reliable approach. Breaking the monopoly of big companies is indeed a necessity, but I'm worried it might just become another concept hype. --- If the incentive mechanism is in place, this could work. Keep an eye on it. --- Thinking back to the previous wave of decentralization, everyone said the same. And in the end? --- The reward distribution based on contribution sounds perfect in theory, but it's hard to implement in practice.

View OriginalReply0

0xSleepDeprived

· 01-05 10:28

靠，又是另一个"去中心化救世"的故事...但Base那边确实在动真格模型烂大街，关键还是激励机制能不能真的让开发者赚到钱这次真的不一样吗？我有点信算力分散听起来爽，就怕最后还是大户吃肉小户喝汤等着看谁能活到明年

Reply0