Why Have Oracles Become a Key Infrastructure in Web3?
The power of smart contracts is limitless, but they have a fatal flaw—they are inherently “blind” and cannot access off-chain real-world data. This is the purpose of oracles: they serve as information channels between smart contracts and the outside world, enabling automated programs to make decisions based on real data.
From DeFi lending to on-chain insurance, from supply chain traceability to RWA tokenization, almost all advanced applications rely on oracles. The emergence of Decentralized Oracle Networks (DONs) further enhances the security and trustworthiness of this infrastructure.
What is a Decentralized Oracle Network (DON)?
Traditional oracles rely on a single data source, which poses obvious risks. DONs adopt a multi-node architecture: independent nodes fetch data, verify data, and aggregate data in parallel, before recording it on-chain.
The benefits of this approach are clear:
Elimination of single points of failure: one node’s error does not affect the overall system
Prevention of data tampering: multi-source verification greatly reduces manipulation risks
Enhanced reliability: consensus mechanisms ensure data accuracy
This is especially important for complex scenarios (e.g., agricultural insurance requiring real-time weather data, DeFi needing precise price feeds).
Node Selection — Protocol selects a group of independent nodes from the node pool
Data Retrieval — Each node fetches data from different sources
Verification and Aggregation — Nodes verify each other, generating an authoritative data point through consensus
On-Chain Delivery — Final data is written to the blockchain
Reward Settlement — Nodes receive token rewards for their contributions
5 Decentralized Oracle Projects to Watch in 2025
1. RedStone (RED): Champion in Speed and Scale
Basic Data:
Supported Chains: 110+
Number of Clients: 170+
Asset Types: 1300+
Protected Asset Value: $7.449 billion
RedStone breaks the traditional oracle constraints with a “modular” design, supporting both push and pull modes, with a delivery latency of only 2.4 milliseconds. From its first DeFi integration in early 2023 to a protected scale of $9 billion by September 2025, its growth is remarkable.
Notably, RedStone now not only provides oracle services but has evolved into a “data ecosystem” by acquiring Credora’s DeFi rating platform. It has become the official oracle provider for mainstream tokenized assets like BlackRock BUIDL, Apollo ACRED, and others, directly participating in the RWA boom.
Advantages: Zero history of price errors, proven reliability, future-oriented architecture Risks: Integration process is relatively complex
2. Pyth Network (PYTH): Expert in Financial Data
Basic Data:
Main Chains: Solana, EOS, EVM-compatible chains, Stacks, Sei, Linea, Neutron
Project Integrations: 230+ (on-chain + off-chain)
Data Sources: 380+
Pyth’s positioning is clear—focused on high-fidelity financial data rather than broad coverage. It aggregates price information from professional data providers, offering high-frequency market data updates. PYTH tokens incentivize data providers to ensure accuracy.
Ideal for: DeFi lending, derivatives trading, algorithmic trading, and other latency-sensitive applications.
Advantages: High-quality financial data, deep cooperation with traditional financial institutions, fast real-time updates Disadvantages: Relatively specialized application scenarios, updates limited to the financial domain
3. Band Protocol (BAND): Flexibility and Cross-Chain Capability
Band Protocol operates on a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) mechanism, where validators stake BAND tokens to participate in the network. Its two core selling points are cross-chain data sharing and customizable oracle scripts.
Want to define your own data logic? Just write it in Band’s scripting language. This flexibility makes it especially popular for complex applications.
Advantages: Strong scalability, comprehensive cross-chain functionality, community-driven Disadvantages: Less well-known than top-tier projects, potential network effect disadvantages
4. API3 (API3): Direct API Connection to Blockchain
API3’s innovation lies in removing middlemen—traditional oracles require third-party node operators as intermediaries, whereas API3 allows API providers to operate nodes directly, delivering data straight to smart contracts.
This reduces trust layers, minimizes failure points, and lowers costs. API3 tokens are used for ecosystem governance.
Advantages: Direct connection interfaces, minimal failure points, high decentralization Disadvantages: Market is relatively new, adoption is still growing
5. Flare Network (FLR): The Interoperability Hub
Basic Data:
Supported Chains: Ethereum, Cosmos, other EVM-compatible chains
Projects Integrated: 270+
Flare is a unique hybrid: it borrows Ethereum’s smart contract capabilities but uses Avalanche’s consensus protocol. This combination balances speed and security. Notably, it can handle tokens like XRP, which are not Turing-complete.
FLR tokens are used for governance and as collateral for issuing and redeeming assets within the ecosystem.
Advantages: Outstanding scalability, multi-chain compatibility, innovative consensus mechanism Disadvantages: Still in development stage, future uncertainties
How to Choose the Most Worthwhile Decentralized Oracle for Investment?
Technical Dimension
How secure are the oracle’s mechanisms, data verification innovations, and scalability?
Does it solve real-world problems?
Ecosystem Dimension
How many projects are using it? Who are the partners?
Community activity and transparency?
Economic Dimension
What is the actual use of the token (governance, staking, rewards)?
Does it support multi-chain deployment to expand application scope?
Decentralized oracle networks are no longer “optional” but have become an essential part of Web3 infrastructure. From DeFi to RWA tokenization, from insurance to supply chains, these applications all depend on highly trustworthy off-chain data.
The top five players currently each have their strengths: RedStone leads in speed and scale, Pyth specializes in financial data, Band emphasizes flexibility, API3 pushes for decentralization, and Flare focuses on interoperability.
Investors should understand: choosing an oracle essentially means choosing “whose data I dare to use.” Examining technology, ecosystem, and economic models is important, but ultimately, actual usage volume and community trust matter most.
As on-chain application complexity increases, the importance of oracles will become even more prominent. In 2025, this sector is worth continuous attention.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Decentralized Oracle Networks to Watch: A Must-See Project Guide for 2025
Why Have Oracles Become a Key Infrastructure in Web3?
The power of smart contracts is limitless, but they have a fatal flaw—they are inherently “blind” and cannot access off-chain real-world data. This is the purpose of oracles: they serve as information channels between smart contracts and the outside world, enabling automated programs to make decisions based on real data.
From DeFi lending to on-chain insurance, from supply chain traceability to RWA tokenization, almost all advanced applications rely on oracles. The emergence of Decentralized Oracle Networks (DONs) further enhances the security and trustworthiness of this infrastructure.
What is a Decentralized Oracle Network (DON)?
Traditional oracles rely on a single data source, which poses obvious risks. DONs adopt a multi-node architecture: independent nodes fetch data, verify data, and aggregate data in parallel, before recording it on-chain.
The benefits of this approach are clear:
This is especially important for complex scenarios (e.g., agricultural insurance requiring real-time weather data, DeFi needing precise price feeds).
How Do Oracle Protocols Work? A Six-Step Process
5 Decentralized Oracle Projects to Watch in 2025
1. RedStone (RED): Champion in Speed and Scale
Basic Data:
RedStone breaks the traditional oracle constraints with a “modular” design, supporting both push and pull modes, with a delivery latency of only 2.4 milliseconds. From its first DeFi integration in early 2023 to a protected scale of $9 billion by September 2025, its growth is remarkable.
Notably, RedStone now not only provides oracle services but has evolved into a “data ecosystem” by acquiring Credora’s DeFi rating platform. It has become the official oracle provider for mainstream tokenized assets like BlackRock BUIDL, Apollo ACRED, and others, directly participating in the RWA boom.
Advantages: Zero history of price errors, proven reliability, future-oriented architecture
Risks: Integration process is relatively complex
2. Pyth Network (PYTH): Expert in Financial Data
Basic Data:
Pyth’s positioning is clear—focused on high-fidelity financial data rather than broad coverage. It aggregates price information from professional data providers, offering high-frequency market data updates. PYTH tokens incentivize data providers to ensure accuracy.
Ideal for: DeFi lending, derivatives trading, algorithmic trading, and other latency-sensitive applications.
Advantages: High-quality financial data, deep cooperation with traditional financial institutions, fast real-time updates
Disadvantages: Relatively specialized application scenarios, updates limited to the financial domain
3. Band Protocol (BAND): Flexibility and Cross-Chain Capability
Basic Data:
Band Protocol operates on a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) mechanism, where validators stake BAND tokens to participate in the network. Its two core selling points are cross-chain data sharing and customizable oracle scripts.
Want to define your own data logic? Just write it in Band’s scripting language. This flexibility makes it especially popular for complex applications.
Advantages: Strong scalability, comprehensive cross-chain functionality, community-driven
Disadvantages: Less well-known than top-tier projects, potential network effect disadvantages
4. API3 (API3): Direct API Connection to Blockchain
Basic Data:
API3’s innovation lies in removing middlemen—traditional oracles require third-party node operators as intermediaries, whereas API3 allows API providers to operate nodes directly, delivering data straight to smart contracts.
This reduces trust layers, minimizes failure points, and lowers costs. API3 tokens are used for ecosystem governance.
Advantages: Direct connection interfaces, minimal failure points, high decentralization
Disadvantages: Market is relatively new, adoption is still growing
5. Flare Network (FLR): The Interoperability Hub
Basic Data:
Flare is a unique hybrid: it borrows Ethereum’s smart contract capabilities but uses Avalanche’s consensus protocol. This combination balances speed and security. Notably, it can handle tokens like XRP, which are not Turing-complete.
FLR tokens are used for governance and as collateral for issuing and redeeming assets within the ecosystem.
Advantages: Outstanding scalability, multi-chain compatibility, innovative consensus mechanism
Disadvantages: Still in development stage, future uncertainties
How to Choose the Most Worthwhile Decentralized Oracle for Investment?
Technical Dimension
Ecosystem Dimension
Economic Dimension
Application Dimension
Fundamentals Dimension
The Outlook for the Oracle Sector Before 2025
Decentralized oracle networks are no longer “optional” but have become an essential part of Web3 infrastructure. From DeFi to RWA tokenization, from insurance to supply chains, these applications all depend on highly trustworthy off-chain data.
The top five players currently each have their strengths: RedStone leads in speed and scale, Pyth specializes in financial data, Band emphasizes flexibility, API3 pushes for decentralization, and Flare focuses on interoperability.
Investors should understand: choosing an oracle essentially means choosing “whose data I dare to use.” Examining technology, ecosystem, and economic models is important, but ultimately, actual usage volume and community trust matter most.
As on-chain application complexity increases, the importance of oracles will become even more prominent. In 2025, this sector is worth continuous attention.