Q4 2025 has an interesting phenomenon—the on-chain transfer volume of Ethereum has surged to $8 trillion. How exaggerated is this figure? It's nearly ten times Switzerland's entire annual GDP.
But here's the problem. Daily active addresses have surpassed 10 million, and the number of transactions has doubled compared to Q2, but what about the token price? It’s still stagnant. It’s like having stellar performance but not seeing the stock price move up—that’s frustrating.
**Why is this happening? Actually, it’s a "Infrastructure Paradox."**
Imagine Ethereum as Manhattan’s prime real estate. A few years ago, network congestion and exorbitant fees forced everyone to move to layer 2 solutions or other chains. But now, things are different—the roads are widened, systems optimized, transaction throughput has greatly improved, and Gas fees have plummeted. Theoretically, this should be a good thing.
But reality is harsh. Ethereum is now caught in a "low margin, high volume" dilemma. On-chain efficiency has increased a hundredfold, but network fees have decreased a thousandfold. The result is transaction volume exploding while revenue shrinks. This growth without proportional income suppresses the upward potential of the token price.
**So why are big players (institutions) still confidently betting on Ethereum?**
Simply put, in the eyes of financial giants, "consensus" is the most solid rule. No matter how fast or cheap other chains are, if they haven’t undergone extreme stress tests involving hundreds of billions of dollars, institutions won’t feel secure investing real money. Take RWA (Real World Asset) on-chain—65% of global assets are running on Ethereum. Giants like BlackRock and Franklin Templeton aren’t fools—they know that in the face of trillions of dollars, speed is just a bonus; security and consensus are the key factors.
The data is clear: December daily active addresses exceeded 10 million, with 2.23 million transactions per day. Infrastructure is already in place, and application explosion is only a matter of time. From my perspective, this is the most severe disconnect between "price" and "value" right now.
But on the other hand, if you’re still relying on it to make you overnight riches, you might have chosen the wrong track. The real opportunity lies in positioning for the financial settlement rights of the next decade—Ethereum remains irreplaceable in that regard.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainArchaeologist
· 01-08 08:01
The dilemma of small profits and quick sales is well said; this is the fate of Ethereum.
View OriginalReply0
ServantOfSatoshi
· 01-05 11:52
The strategy of small profits and quick turnover, to put it simply, is Ethereum selling itself cheaply. The transfer volume explodes while the price remains at the floor; this logic indeed doesn't hold up... But on the other hand, institutional bets are not without reason; consensus is worth much more than speed.
The 80 trillion transfer volume still causes the price to fall; this is a joke... But thinking about it carefully, the sharp drop in transaction fees is indeed very frustrating.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 01-05 11:43
The transfer volume surges but the price doesn't rise, this is outrageous. Feels like working for someone else?
Q4 2025 has an interesting phenomenon—the on-chain transfer volume of Ethereum has surged to $8 trillion. How exaggerated is this figure? It's nearly ten times Switzerland's entire annual GDP.
But here's the problem. Daily active addresses have surpassed 10 million, and the number of transactions has doubled compared to Q2, but what about the token price? It’s still stagnant. It’s like having stellar performance but not seeing the stock price move up—that’s frustrating.
**Why is this happening? Actually, it’s a "Infrastructure Paradox."**
Imagine Ethereum as Manhattan’s prime real estate. A few years ago, network congestion and exorbitant fees forced everyone to move to layer 2 solutions or other chains. But now, things are different—the roads are widened, systems optimized, transaction throughput has greatly improved, and Gas fees have plummeted. Theoretically, this should be a good thing.
But reality is harsh. Ethereum is now caught in a "low margin, high volume" dilemma. On-chain efficiency has increased a hundredfold, but network fees have decreased a thousandfold. The result is transaction volume exploding while revenue shrinks. This growth without proportional income suppresses the upward potential of the token price.
**So why are big players (institutions) still confidently betting on Ethereum?**
Simply put, in the eyes of financial giants, "consensus" is the most solid rule. No matter how fast or cheap other chains are, if they haven’t undergone extreme stress tests involving hundreds of billions of dollars, institutions won’t feel secure investing real money. Take RWA (Real World Asset) on-chain—65% of global assets are running on Ethereum. Giants like BlackRock and Franklin Templeton aren’t fools—they know that in the face of trillions of dollars, speed is just a bonus; security and consensus are the key factors.
The data is clear: December daily active addresses exceeded 10 million, with 2.23 million transactions per day. Infrastructure is already in place, and application explosion is only a matter of time. From my perspective, this is the most severe disconnect between "price" and "value" right now.
But on the other hand, if you’re still relying on it to make you overnight riches, you might have chosen the wrong track. The real opportunity lies in positioning for the financial settlement rights of the next decade—Ethereum remains irreplaceable in that regard.