#数字资产动态追踪 $ASTER The story behind this wave of stop-loss is quite interesting. Yi Lihua's comment "can't find the founder" sounds a bit vague at first, but when broken down, there are actually only two possibilities: either there is a founder but they've been unreachable, or there is no such role set at all.
But is it really just because they can't contact the founder that they cut their heavy holdings? That seems a bit unrealistic. After all, the Aster team members are spread across various communities, so finding someone isn't really difficult.
That leaves only one explanation — Aster indeed doesn't have a traditional "founder" role. Looking at Leonard's Twitter, his title is CEO, and no one has ever labeled themselves as a founder. This is quite interesting.
My understanding is that, as a major holder, Yi Lihua wanted to discuss deeper strategies and profit-sharing with the team, but found that no one could make the final decision. In other words, this team might lack a true decision-maker with real authority.
The true meaning behind Yi Lihua's words, I think, is actually: **This team can't find someone to make the final call**. For a project's governance structure, this is indeed a warning sign.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
11
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainMelonWatcher
· 01-08 07:47
Oh no, this is the real problem here.
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollector
· 01-08 05:36
Speaking of which, no one can make the final decision on this matter, which is indeed quite risky.
View OriginalReply0
HaonanChen
· 01-06 05:36
I think this logic is fine haha, I still prefer to go short.
View OriginalReply0
OnePlatformForAllDiseases-
· 01-05 12:48
But this is the future development of DAO. Only those who are not involved in the decision-making process can prevent more dark secrets, rather than big players holding positions and demanding benefits. Remember, the benefits they seek are all taken from ordinary people.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitor
· 01-05 11:58
Hmm... No one making the decision on this matter is indeed quite fatal, no wonder they had to cut losses.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainArchaeologist
· 01-05 11:54
Wow, this logical deduction is amazing. No one can make the final call, but it's definitely a red flag.
View OriginalReply0
Token_Sherpa
· 01-05 11:45
ngl this governance vacuum thing tracks—seen it before with projects that confuse decentralization theater with actual decision-making infrastructure. lack of a proper decision-maker isn't a feature, it's a structural liability masquerading as idealism.
Reply0
IronHeadMiner
· 01-05 11:41
找不到话事人啊,这才是核心啊哥们
Reply0
GateUser-5d40e195
· 01-05 11:36
Who can find the creator of BTC
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 01-05 11:33
Projects without a clear decision-maker truly need to be pushed forward. Betting on people is risky—when no one is certain who has the final say, the risk becomes significant.
#数字资产动态追踪 $ASTER The story behind this wave of stop-loss is quite interesting. Yi Lihua's comment "can't find the founder" sounds a bit vague at first, but when broken down, there are actually only two possibilities: either there is a founder but they've been unreachable, or there is no such role set at all.
But is it really just because they can't contact the founder that they cut their heavy holdings? That seems a bit unrealistic. After all, the Aster team members are spread across various communities, so finding someone isn't really difficult.
That leaves only one explanation — Aster indeed doesn't have a traditional "founder" role. Looking at Leonard's Twitter, his title is CEO, and no one has ever labeled themselves as a founder. This is quite interesting.
My understanding is that, as a major holder, Yi Lihua wanted to discuss deeper strategies and profit-sharing with the team, but found that no one could make the final decision. In other words, this team might lack a true decision-maker with real authority.
The true meaning behind Yi Lihua's words, I think, is actually: **This team can't find someone to make the final call**. For a project's governance structure, this is indeed a warning sign.