Standard Chartered analyst Geoffrey Kendrick offers an optimistic outlook on Bitcoin and XRP, but the investment logic for Bitcoin is quietly evolving as market structures adjust.The most overlooked truth in the crypto world is: changes in institutional design influence future trends more than price forecasts.
From “Market Volatility” to “Policy Infrastructure” Shift
When U.S. policy attitudes become friendly, it’s not merely to stimulate price increases. The real change lies in who is allowed to enter the market, how they do so, and what the transaction costs are.
Recent signals point in the same direction:
Stablecoin framework enters substantive legislative process
Custody restrictions for banking institutions are gradually lifted, lowering compliance barriers
The White House promotes the establishment of strategic Bitcoin reserves and digital asset allocations
All these convey a core message: Policy makers are working to eliminate uncertainty, not create it.
Bitcoin: The Overlooked “Boredom Argument” Is Actually the Strongest
The key to whether Bitcoin can rise by 2027 isn’t some fanciful story, but a simple yet often underestimated mechanism: Once ETFs become mainstream, institutional allocations will become routine, not cyclical madness.
Currently, BTC trades around $92.11K, but Kendrick’s understanding of this logic has recently adjusted. Some of his Bitcoin roadmap was revised after last October’s pullback because:
Enterprise-level Bitcoin treasury needs are not as strong as expected
ETF inflows are taking on more of the “main role”
Therefore, targets like “reaching $225K by 2027” should be viewed as a snapshot at a certain point in time, not a final promise.
What plausible path could Bitcoin take to rise by 2027?
ETF inflows shift from “intermittent” to “policy-driven routine allocations”
Macro volatility no longer repeatedly forces institutions to cut positions and stop losses
Miners, wallet holders, and leveraged longs do not all sell off simultaneously, causing a cascade
XRP: A promising-looking but highly variable gamble
The story of Ripple (XRP) seems straightforward: faster and cheaper cross-border settlements. But the real question is: When stablecoins already exist, why do financial institutions still use a volatile asset as a bridge?
Based on market discussions, Kendrick has mentioned that XRP could reach $10.40 by 2027, with the key catalysts being ETF approval and capital inflows. Theoretically, this isn’t impossible, but it heavily depends on:
Whether real AUM can be accumulated after ETF approval, rather than just a fleeting first-week listing
Whether cross-border payment and settlement use cases truly scale up, creating tangible structural demand (not just inflated trading volume)
Whether competitors (various stablecoins and other solutions) can more efficiently absorb the same applications
Understanding XRP honestly: it’s a convexity bet. If catalysts materialize, XRP could surge significantly; if not, you’re just holding a story. Currently, XRP is priced at $2.25, with a huge gap to the $10.40 target, but whether that gap can be filled depends on the simultaneous likelihood of the three conditions above.
Three monitoring points to avoid market sentiment traps
Rather than chasing predictions, focus on these real-time variables:
Sustainability of ETF inflows—not just a week or two of data, but whether the trend over several months remains steady
Details of policy implementation—regulatory-friendly headlines are less important than actual execution details
Composition of market participants—who is buying? Direct spot, ETF-structured products, or leveraged derivatives? This determines the resilience of price increases
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
2027 Crypto Investment Outlook: Bitcoin's fundamentals are more plausible, but Ripple needs more variables to take off
Standard Chartered analyst Geoffrey Kendrick offers an optimistic outlook on Bitcoin and XRP, but the investment logic for Bitcoin is quietly evolving as market structures adjust. The most overlooked truth in the crypto world is: changes in institutional design influence future trends more than price forecasts.
From “Market Volatility” to “Policy Infrastructure” Shift
When U.S. policy attitudes become friendly, it’s not merely to stimulate price increases. The real change lies in who is allowed to enter the market, how they do so, and what the transaction costs are.
Recent signals point in the same direction:
All these convey a core message: Policy makers are working to eliminate uncertainty, not create it.
Bitcoin: The Overlooked “Boredom Argument” Is Actually the Strongest
The key to whether Bitcoin can rise by 2027 isn’t some fanciful story, but a simple yet often underestimated mechanism: Once ETFs become mainstream, institutional allocations will become routine, not cyclical madness.
Currently, BTC trades around $92.11K, but Kendrick’s understanding of this logic has recently adjusted. Some of his Bitcoin roadmap was revised after last October’s pullback because:
Therefore, targets like “reaching $225K by 2027” should be viewed as a snapshot at a certain point in time, not a final promise.
What plausible path could Bitcoin take to rise by 2027?
XRP: A promising-looking but highly variable gamble
The story of Ripple (XRP) seems straightforward: faster and cheaper cross-border settlements. But the real question is: When stablecoins already exist, why do financial institutions still use a volatile asset as a bridge?
Based on market discussions, Kendrick has mentioned that XRP could reach $10.40 by 2027, with the key catalysts being ETF approval and capital inflows. Theoretically, this isn’t impossible, but it heavily depends on:
Understanding XRP honestly: it’s a convexity bet. If catalysts materialize, XRP could surge significantly; if not, you’re just holding a story. Currently, XRP is priced at $2.25, with a huge gap to the $10.40 target, but whether that gap can be filled depends on the simultaneous likelihood of the three conditions above.
Three monitoring points to avoid market sentiment traps
Rather than chasing predictions, focus on these real-time variables:
Sustainability of ETF inflows—not just a week or two of data, but whether the trend over several months remains steady
Details of policy implementation—regulatory-friendly headlines are less important than actual execution details
Composition of market participants—who is buying? Direct spot, ETF-structured products, or leveraged derivatives? This determines the resilience of price increases