2026-01-06 20:30:28

The zero-fee growth strategy is reshaping the competitive landscape of exchanges. The LIGHTER project has set its sights on the RWA track, which is a direction worth paying attention to.

If it can truly achieve differentiation in the tokenization of real assets, will there be a moment of "dimensionality reduction" attack in the future? After all, RWA has been the most interested topic for institutions since last year, and the integration of on-chain assets with the real world no longer seems like a fantasy.

Innovation in business models often precedes market recognition. Will we see that breakthrough moment this time?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

consensus_whisperer

· 8h ago

How long can the zero-fee strategy last? The key still depends on whether RWA can truly be implemented --- Sounds good, but there are quite a few competitors in this track. Why can LIGHTER break through? --- Dimensionality reduction attack? Institutional money has already smelled the opportunity; it all depends on who can catch it --- Innovating business models ≠ market recognition. Sometimes this gap can really kill a project --- RWA is hot, but now 90% of the projects entering are just hyping concepts, right? --- Differentiation is very difficult; very few can actually deliver --- Wait, can the zero-fee model really survive long-term? That's what I care about --- Another RWA project... Is this really different this time? I remain skeptical --- Breakthrough moment? Easier said than done; surviving the bear market is the real test

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 01-07 03:46

Zero fee rate is really a brilliant move, but it depends on how it will be monetized later RWA is indeed hot right now, with institutions paying close attention. The key is who can actually implement it Dimensionality reduction attack? Don't think too far ahead for now, just stabilize the fundamentals However, the LIGHTER approach is quite interesting and worth following up on

View OriginalReply0

RetailTherapist

· 01-06 20:56

The zero-fee trick has long been tired, I'm just worried that LIGHTER might have the same problem. RWA indeed attracts institutions, but how many have actually been implemented? Frankly, it's still just conceptual hype. Dimensionality reduction attack? Sounds great, but I want to see real trading volume with actual money, not just constant concept bombardment.

View OriginalReply0

AllInAlice

· 01-06 20:55

Zero-fee tricks are also being played by institutions; LIGHTER will only be interesting if it truly differentiates itself. RWA is indeed hot right now, but it depends on who can truly implement it... It's another "breakthrough moment," last year they said the same about this year. Dimensionality reduction attacks sound great, but in reality, they often fall flat.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 01-06 20:52

The zero-fee approach has long been something that should have been implemented. Whether LIGHTER can truly block the RWA loophole depends on their execution capability.

View OriginalReply0

liquiditea_sipper

· 01-06 20:51

I've seen the zero-fee trick too many times, but RWA really has some potential. Dimensionality reduction? Ha, let's see if we can survive this bear market first.

View OriginalReply0

ForkInTheRoad

· 01-06 20:39

Zero-fee strategy, to put it simply, is about overdrawing the future to gain current market share. How long it can hold is still uncertain. RWA is indeed popular, but when it comes to entering with LIGHTER, it still depends on whether the team is reliable. Differentiation is easy to talk about but hard to implement. Dimensionality reduction? Uh... we should wait until this bear market is over before boasting. Institutions are indeed watching RWA, but what exactly is the real breakthrough... I also want to know this. I understand the logic behind LIGHTER's zero-fee approach, but I don't know how the business closed-loop is self-consistent. Something feels off. As for on-chain real assets, it seems we have to wait for clearer regulatory attitudes. There are too many variables right now.

View OriginalReply0