2026-01-07 02:00:44

#数字资产动态追踪 The crypto market correction is as common as eating. A single day's decline can cause psychological ups and downs that others experience in a year.

FUD is everywhere, but you don't have to take every piece to heart. There’s nothing wrong with Chinese meme coins, and choosing a public chain isn’t an issue either. The real problem has never been at the chain level.

Those projects that can persist rely not on short-term hype, but on core communities that are still building, continuously delivering, and working diligently. This is the true source of a project’s vitality.

On our side, we will continue to do what needs to be done well.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractTester

· 01-09 15:06

It's true that a pullback is part of the process; you need to keep a steady mindset, or else it feels like riding a roller coaster every day.

View OriginalReply0

SelfRugger

· 01-09 09:17

That's right, mindset is really much more important than choosing coins. A team that persists in doing things will eventually be recognized, so there's no need to worry about those distractions.

View OriginalReply0

Token_Sherpa

· 01-08 16:14

nah, the real tell is who's still building when the charts look like a graveyard. everyone else is just noise anyway tbh

Reply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 01-07 02:30

According to research, the "overreaction hypothesis" in market psychology was already discussed in Debondt and Thaler's 1985 paper— the daily-level volatility in the crypto space is essentially caused by information asymmetry leading to pricing inefficiencies, which is as common as eating? This analogy is overly optimistic; it should be said that it is the result of intertwined irrational emotions. That said, from a technical architecture perspective, those communities that continuously output indeed represent the project's long-term resilience. It is worth noting that the lifecycle of short-term hype usually follows an S-curve, while the contribution of constructive communities shows linear growth—data doesn't lie.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 01-07 02:26

A correction is essentially the market's pricing mechanism readjusting. The key still depends on whether the community incentive-compatible design is sufficient—those that truly survive are nothing more than those with higher governance efficiency and more thorough decentralization. The historical lessons are there; projects that are driven by short-term speculation all eventually fail.

View OriginalReply0

DisillusiionOracle

· 01-07 02:25

Well said, the real projects are those who are still working on them.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoFortuneTeller

· 01-07 02:21

Wake up everyone, if you're still scared by the pullback, you should take a closer look at the projects that are actually getting things done. --- Well said, a one-day decline can shake others' confidence for a year. That's the daily life in the crypto world. --- No matter how much FUD there is, it’s useless. Teams that focus on building have long ignored these distractions. --- The core community is the key. Projects that rely on hype will eventually die. --- Don’t think about anything else, just focus on projects that are continuously delivering. Everything else is noise. --- So after all this talk, it still comes down to persistence and action. Is it really that simple? --- The logic of the crypto world is like this: those who keep working seriously will survive longer, everything else is just fleeting.

View OriginalReply0

YieldFarmRefugee

· 01-07 02:11

That's what they say, but how many can truly settle down and focus on their work? Most are probably scared away by FUD.

View OriginalReply0