There's been quite a bit of interesting analysis emerging lately on what a post-ASI landscape might actually look like. One piece that stands out explores how traditional institutional models—built fundamentally on scarcity constraints—will likely face structural pressure. As artificial superintelligence reshapes resource availability and information dynamics, the thinking goes, entirely new organizational patterns will take shape. Rather than hierarchical institutions, we're heading toward something more fluid: networks organized around specific curiosity clusters and shared intellectual pursuits. It's a shift from scarcity-based gatekeeping to abundance-driven collaboration. Worth spending a few minutes thinking through these ideas about how fundamental economic assumptions might transform.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ser_we_are_earlyvip
· 01-07 02:53
This analysis of the post-ASI era is indeed worth pondering... But to put it nicely, can a spontaneous and orderly knowledge network really form after scarcity disappears? Or will it evolve into another form of power struggle?
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observervip
· 01-07 02:48
Hmm... From the source code perspective, this logical vulnerability is quite obvious. Will scarcity truly disappear? --- Interesting discovery, but one clarification is needed—when abundance arrives, will the power structures dissolve, or will they be reinforced in new forms? --- Theoretically, that's correct, but in actual deployment... I always feel it will be blocked by new bottlenecks. --- There's a misconception here, right? When information is abundant, it's even easier to form new black holes in the network, isn't it? --- Considering all factors, the abstract "Curiosity Cluster" sounds good, but who defines and coordinates it? Or is it just a different flavor of the same old story? --- Wait, this assumes human motivation is singular... This premise needs further validation. --- I'm curious, how does profit distribution work under the abundance model? Can non-zero-sum games really be stable? --- Technically speaking, distributed collaboration sounds great, but how to design incentive mechanisms to avoid failures...
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofstervip
· 01-07 02:35
ngl, the scarcity-to-abundance framing here is kinda... glossing over the hard part? like, theoretically sound, sure. but the implementation details on how trust gets established in these "curiosity clusters" without hierarchical structures—that's where it gets messy. trustless coordination at scale is still an open problem, not just some natural emergent property of abundance lol
Reply0
RatioHuntervip
· 01-07 02:31
Wait a minute, isn't this logic a bit too idealistic... Can the reality truly transition smoothly from scarcity to abundance?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)