Have you ever wondered why most people in a bear market either hold onto stablecoins (with a 0% yield) or are forced to mine and take risks? This binary dilemma seems to have become a longstanding challenge in DeFi.
Lista DAO's approach is a bit different. They have created a collateralized generation mechanism: using your assets as collateral to mint interest-bearing stablecoin lisUSD. This coin is pegged to 1 USD, but the key difference is— it can generate its own yield.
From another perspective: regular stablecoins are just dead money, sitting there for observation. lisUSD, on the other hand, has built-in yield logic. While you hold it, the protocol automatically distributes profits to token holders from sources like lending interest, liquidation fees, and protocol revenue. Market volatility? You get the hedging properties of a stablecoin. Market stability? You’re still earning. This combination indeed reduces the cost of choice.
Technically speaking, deploying across multiple chains like BSC and Ethereum enhances both liquidity and efficiency. If a stablecoin product can only operate on a single chain, its liquidity will inevitably be limited. Multi-chain coverage directly solves this bottleneck.
Many innovative projects emerging in DeFi over the past two years are often hidden within this "counterintuitive" logic—aiming for safety, yield, and flexibility all at once. The next breakout product might come from protocols that attempt to break this traditional binary opposition.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CommunitySlacker
· 01-10 16:38
Sounds good, but can lisUSD really beat inflation?
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiary
· 01-09 18:08
Sounds good, but can lisUSD really stay stable at $1?
By the way, multi-chain deployment is indeed the trend, and liquidity is unquestionable.
Wait, where does the yield come from, is it really reliable?
It's another case of "wanting it all," just listen, brother.
Stablecoins with yields sound appealing, but I won't follow the trend this time; I've been burned too many times.
Multi-chain coverage is the right direction, but that's not enough on its own.
Forget it, let's go with USDC, I'm exhausted.
This logic is indeed counterintuitive, but DeFi traps are even more counterintuitive.
The yield distribution mechanism sounds great, but what if it runs away with the funds?
I just want to know when we can live without relying on the mining economy.
Holding onto stablecoins in a bear market is just being cowardly, but it's still better than liquidation.
Brother, your description sounds like you're selling something; believe it or not, I choose to trust or not.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollector
· 01-07 17:49
Sounds good, but I still have some concerns about the logic of stablecoins generating returns.
Where do the returns come from? In the end, someone still has to take the loss.
View OriginalReply0
ForumMiningMaster
· 01-07 17:48
Do stablecoins generate returns? I like this logic; finally, I don't have to choose between risk and boredom anymore.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugs
· 01-07 17:48
No hype, no negativity. This set of logic indeed breaks the deadlock.
Finally, a protocol has figured out this matter. Embedding the returns makes a real difference.
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOn
· 01-07 17:44
No, clinging to stablecoins is the real absurdity. Earning zero and comforting oneself with low risk—can you accept this logic?
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 01-07 17:32
Sounds good, but can it really provide stable returns?
Or is it another new liquidation risk?
Multi-chain deployment sounds crazy, is there really enough liquidity?
Have you ever wondered why most people in a bear market either hold onto stablecoins (with a 0% yield) or are forced to mine and take risks? This binary dilemma seems to have become a longstanding challenge in DeFi.
Lista DAO's approach is a bit different. They have created a collateralized generation mechanism: using your assets as collateral to mint interest-bearing stablecoin lisUSD. This coin is pegged to 1 USD, but the key difference is— it can generate its own yield.
From another perspective: regular stablecoins are just dead money, sitting there for observation. lisUSD, on the other hand, has built-in yield logic. While you hold it, the protocol automatically distributes profits to token holders from sources like lending interest, liquidation fees, and protocol revenue. Market volatility? You get the hedging properties of a stablecoin. Market stability? You’re still earning. This combination indeed reduces the cost of choice.
Technically speaking, deploying across multiple chains like BSC and Ethereum enhances both liquidity and efficiency. If a stablecoin product can only operate on a single chain, its liquidity will inevitably be limited. Multi-chain coverage directly solves this bottleneck.
Many innovative projects emerging in DeFi over the past two years are often hidden within this "counterintuitive" logic—aiming for safety, yield, and flexibility all at once. The next breakout product might come from protocols that attempt to break this traditional binary opposition.