Regarding the Walrus token, I need to clarify one point—please don't think of it as a speculative asset that relies solely on hype and concept packaging to attract attention. This is a token with real application scenarios; investing in it means acquiring participation rights in the Walrus ecosystem, which can be exchanged for actual services and ecosystem benefits. The first question to ask when evaluating a token is: what problem does it solve? Are there genuine users? No matter how attractive the concept is, it’s meaningless if no one uses it.

Another very practical bonus is that a major exchange has already listed it. What does this mean? Liquidity is assured, trading pairs are sufficient, and you don’t have to worry about slippage when selling. Credit backing, risk control mechanisms, and market depth are all important factors. However, this is also the most easily misunderstood point by newcomers: being listed through official channels is just a basic condition, not a guarantee of price increase. All those hype-driven hot spots and sudden surges in certain tokens in the market at most bring a wave of capital inflow. What truly supports long-term growth is something that can be genuinely used—real applications.

Walrus’s uniqueness lies in its focus on RWA (Real World Asset on-chain) — transforming offline assets like office buildings and precious metals into on-chain tokens, backed by real assets. This is not a castle in the air.

For participants, here are some practical suggestions. First, do your homework before investing. Don’t just listen to community influencers; go directly to official sources, carefully review the ecosystem design and development plan, especially how it connects offline assets — this determines whether the project can truly go far.