The turning point of the NFT market is approaching. If you want to select NFT assets in this cycle, how would you plan your layout? This not only tests your judgment of project fundamentals but also your grasp of market sentiment.
The key is to find projects with lasting vitality—not hype-driven trends, but ecosystems with genuine community accumulation and continuous iteration. Many people blindly chase high prices, but true winners often make calm choices at critical moments.
If you can only pick 3, consider these dimensions: first, the project's actual application scenarios and user stickiness; second, the founding team's ongoing investment and ecosystem layout; third, liquidity and risk tolerance in the secondary market.
At this moment, opportunities and risks coexist. Choosing correctly can seize the cycle's dividends; choosing wrongly may also lead to pitfalls. What are your selection criteria?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CascadingDipBuyer
· 5h ago
Honestly, talking about so many dimensions is less meaningful than directly seeing if the team is genuinely working hard. That's the core.
In simple terms, it's a gamble on people—whether those founders truly want to build the ecosystem or just take the profits and run after the initial gains.
My current strategy is to see who is still updating and iterating during the bear market—that's the real signal of sincerity.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster69
· 9h ago
That's true, but how many people can really stay calm? I've seen too many people say they want to focus on fundamentals, but then they still go all-in on the hottest ones.
Honestly, picking just 3 is a bit difficult; market sentiment changes so quickly that today's "ecological accumulation" could become cannon fodder tomorrow.
As for liquidity, I pay a lot of attention to it. Even the best projects are useless if they can't be sold.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHere
· 01-09 20:56
Honestly, it's the same old spiel... Projects with real vitality have already gained a reputation in the community, why do you need to pick?
I've stepped into too many pits, now I only care if the founders are continuously building; everything else is superficial.
How about flow and immutable? Has anyone been discussing them recently?
View OriginalReply0
FlatTax
· 01-09 20:55
Basically, it's about betting on luck, betting that the team won't run away, everything else is just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 01-09 20:48
Honestly, I'm tired of hearing the word "turning point." Last year it was "turning point," the year before it was "turning point," and we're still talking about it now, haha.
Staying calm and making careful choices is the right approach, but I think the key still depends on who is truly building. Projects that are constantly making noise on Twitter tend to be the first to collapse.
Three is too few; I would rather diversify. I'd prefer a smaller proportion rather than going all in on one.
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresent
· 01-09 20:39
Honestly, there are very few projects that can truly survive; most are just fleeting moments of brilliance.
Actually, the hardest part isn't choosing the right project, but not being greedy, everyone.
That's the usual pattern: a reliable team, genuine users, decent liquidity—that's basically it.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugs
· 01-09 20:33
It sounds good, but it's all about who can resist the urge to buy the dip. Most people are rational in words but act impulsively.
Projects with real vitality have long been locked down by institutions, while retail investors are still struggling to pick just 3.
Liquidity is the most painful point. Good projects often have poor liquidity, and those with good liquidity are all pump-and-dump coins, creating a deadlock.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurker
· 01-09 20:33
Honestly, I'm still struggling to pick which 3 to choose and haven't figured out the trick yet. The key is who can survive until the next bear market.
Only projects that a team is seriously working on are truly worth paying attention to.
Having stepped on the坑, I know that liquidity really is a life-and-death line.
The turning point of the NFT market is approaching. If you want to select NFT assets in this cycle, how would you plan your layout? This not only tests your judgment of project fundamentals but also your grasp of market sentiment.
The key is to find projects with lasting vitality—not hype-driven trends, but ecosystems with genuine community accumulation and continuous iteration. Many people blindly chase high prices, but true winners often make calm choices at critical moments.
If you can only pick 3, consider these dimensions: first, the project's actual application scenarios and user stickiness; second, the founding team's ongoing investment and ecosystem layout; third, liquidity and risk tolerance in the secondary market.
At this moment, opportunities and risks coexist. Choosing correctly can seize the cycle's dividends; choosing wrongly may also lead to pitfalls. What are your selection criteria?