A project hitting 700M in trading volume without any liquidations is worth noting. What makes this particularly interesting is the distribution across roughly 50,000 wallets—it shows how the underlying system actually scales when handling real volume.
When you stack that against the 4.7M in annualized revenue figures and the ~21M valuation metrics, you get a clearer picture of what sustainable growth looks like in this space. The zero liquidations across that volume level signals decent system design under pressure, not just hype-driven numbers.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-cff9c776
· 01-10 19:44
700 million in trading volume with zero clearing, this is what true stress testing looks like, not just a numbers game blown out of proportion.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-09 22:53
700M trading volume zero clearing, this is what true system design looks like, not just armchair strategizing
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 01-09 22:52
Zero liquidation processed over 700 million in trading volume? This contract design is indeed quite interesting. The theoretically feasible concepts have been successfully implemented on-chain, maximizing academic value.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-09 22:49
700M volume zero clearance? Now that's real system design, not just on paper numbers.
View OriginalReply0
BoredApeResistance
· 01-09 22:39
700 million trading volume zero clearing, this is the real deal. The dispersion of 50,000 wallets looks comfortable, not an illusion created by a few whales flipping around.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingToReadDocs
· 01-09 22:31
700M trading volume with zero liquidations? You need to take a closer look at this data; it seems a bit off.
A project hitting 700M in trading volume without any liquidations is worth noting. What makes this particularly interesting is the distribution across roughly 50,000 wallets—it shows how the underlying system actually scales when handling real volume.
When you stack that against the 4.7M in annualized revenue figures and the ~21M valuation metrics, you get a clearer picture of what sustainable growth looks like in this space. The zero liquidations across that volume level signals decent system design under pressure, not just hype-driven numbers.