Recently, many people have been discussing the DUSK project, and it is indeed interesting.
On the surface, it is just another project issuing tokens for activities—this time pulling out a prize pool of 3.05 million tokens to attract participants. But a closer look reveals that the underlying logic is worth pondering.
The core lies in its "selective disclosure" zero-knowledge proof technology. Currently, most public blockchains are wavering between compliance and privacy, but DUSK has already applied this solution to real-world scenarios—collaborating with the Dutch Securities Exchange to handle bond on-chain issuance. What does this mean? When traditional finance's trillion-dollar asset class (RWA) urgently needs to find on-chain channels, and must meet regulatory requirements while protecting private data, DUSK's tech stack becomes a scarce solution.
Looking at data from several dimensions:
First is the staking ecosystem. Over 52% of tokens are currently locked in staking pools, with annual yields ranging from 14-17%. This locking ratio reflects long-term optimism among token holders, providing stability to the ecosystem.
Second is application deployment. Its RWA product, Dusk Trade, has already partnered with the Dutch NPEX exchange to handle securities tokenization worth hundreds of millions of euros. This is not just theoretical; it is backed by real exchange data.
Compared to other projects claiming to do RWA, most are still in the experimental stage. DUSK has already turned theory into practical applications accepted by exchanges, leading by quite a margin. Of course, risks always exist in Web3 projects, and no matter how good the technology is, ongoing progress must be closely monitored.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichTrader
· 2h ago
Oops, zero-knowledge proofs combined with RWA, this idea is indeed clear-headed.
This is the approach I like—skip the flashy concepts and go straight to exchange data to speak for itself. Hundreds of millions of euros are right there in front of us.
However, a 52% staking rate is a bit aggressive; I need to take a good look at whether the underlying incentive mechanism is sustainable.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMinion
· 23h ago
The set of zero-knowledge proofs is really difficult for most people to grasp, but the DUSK team has figured it out.
The volume in the Netherlands has truly increased, not just empty talk.
A 52% staking rate is indeed outrageous, indicating that people are united.
Compared to other RWA projects still in the PPT stage, this one is much stronger, I have to admit.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 23h ago
Another story about zero-knowledge proofs, but this time it seems to have truly been implemented.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamer
· 23h ago
This zero-knowledge proof technology definitely has some real skills, not just superficial innovation on paper.
That said, a 52% lock-up rate—this number really needs to be verified for authenticity.
The most crucial factor is still the cooperation with the EU Securities and Exchange Commission; it feels like that’s the real trump card.
Wait, is RWA really about to take off? I find it hard to believe.
All those RWA projects next door are almost dead, so why is DUSK thriving so well?
But an annualized return of 17% is indeed very tempting.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 23h ago
Are they really using it over in the Netherlands? Things are different now.
Zero knowledge proof has been talked about for so many years, and finally someone is actually using it. Other projects are still just in PPTs.
52% of the locked amount is quite intense; these people really believe in it.
Regarding RWA, to be honest, those previous projects were all just hype. DUSK's progress is indeed quite fast.
Handling hundreds of millions of euros, it's not small-scale, but we still need to see how it develops in the long term.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalist
· 23h ago
Wow, no one has really mastered the path of using zero-knowledge proofs for RWA. DUSK this wave is quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalist
· 23h ago
Are zero-knowledge proofs really that impressive? Is the multi-million euro order on the Dutch exchange confirmed?
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 23h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed a bit different when it comes to real-world implementation.
Recently, many people have been discussing the DUSK project, and it is indeed interesting.
On the surface, it is just another project issuing tokens for activities—this time pulling out a prize pool of 3.05 million tokens to attract participants. But a closer look reveals that the underlying logic is worth pondering.
The core lies in its "selective disclosure" zero-knowledge proof technology. Currently, most public blockchains are wavering between compliance and privacy, but DUSK has already applied this solution to real-world scenarios—collaborating with the Dutch Securities Exchange to handle bond on-chain issuance. What does this mean? When traditional finance's trillion-dollar asset class (RWA) urgently needs to find on-chain channels, and must meet regulatory requirements while protecting private data, DUSK's tech stack becomes a scarce solution.
Looking at data from several dimensions:
First is the staking ecosystem. Over 52% of tokens are currently locked in staking pools, with annual yields ranging from 14-17%. This locking ratio reflects long-term optimism among token holders, providing stability to the ecosystem.
Second is application deployment. Its RWA product, Dusk Trade, has already partnered with the Dutch NPEX exchange to handle securities tokenization worth hundreds of millions of euros. This is not just theoretical; it is backed by real exchange data.
Compared to other projects claiming to do RWA, most are still in the experimental stage. DUSK has already turned theory into practical applications accepted by exchanges, leading by quite a margin. Of course, risks always exist in Web3 projects, and no matter how good the technology is, ongoing progress must be closely monitored.