On January 7th, DUSK Network officially launched the DuskEVM mainnet. This launch builds upon the mainnet migration in December and now truly opens the door for developers and institutions.
What are the highlights of the new network? Simply put, it can handle real assets(RWA) and smart contracts while protecting privacy. This is not common in the current blockchain world. Most privacy public chains either take an aggressive approach (privacy first) or compromise on compliance, with few projects achieving both.
Community reactions to this direction have been quite positive. The core focus is on two aspects: whether the compliance features of the new network can attract institutional participation, and whether its practicality can truly be implemented.
Regarding privacy technology, the Phoenix transaction model used by DUSK is worth breaking down. It’s not just simple mixing or hidden addresses, but a scheme based on confidential transactions and one-time ring signatures. It can hide the sender, receiver, and transaction amount, while cryptographically ensuring transaction validity and double-spend prevention. It sounds complex, but for users, it means: transactions are completely private, yet verifiable on-chain.
More importantly, this privacy primitive has been standardized and integrated into DuskEVM, making it as easy for developers to call as using a normal API. You don’t need to be a cryptography expert to add powerful privacy features to your DeFi protocols or asset tokenization products. This significantly lowers the development barrier.
From an ecosystem perspective, this is the reason why DUSK can go far. Privacy technology itself is not valuable; what matters is how many applications are willing to build on top of it. If DuskEVM truly allows institutions and developers to use privacy features as naturally as breathing, then the competitive landscape of Layer-1 blockchains will see new variables.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RooftopVIP
· 01-10 17:54
The combination of privacy + RWA is the right way to go. It's much smarter than those projects that see things as black and white.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamBreaker
· 01-10 17:49
The combination of Privacy + RWA is indeed rare, but I'm worried that it might turn out to be all talk and no action.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66
· 01-10 17:44
Privacy + RWA this combo punch really has some substance; the key still depends on whether developers will actually come to build it.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 01-10 17:44
Wait, I need to dig into this timeline first... The mainnet migration scheduled for December is officially launching in January, and this pace seems quite deliberate. Based on on-chain data, what does this phased rollout typically imply? Worth paying attention to.
However, the Phoenix transaction model is quite interesting—batch ring signatures combined with confidential transactions... After analysis and assessment, this is indeed more advanced than simple coin mixing. But here’s the problem—if institutions are to adopt it on a large scale, how do privacy and compliance not conflict? An obvious paradox, there must be some compromises involved.
On January 7th, DUSK Network officially launched the DuskEVM mainnet. This launch builds upon the mainnet migration in December and now truly opens the door for developers and institutions.
What are the highlights of the new network? Simply put, it can handle real assets(RWA) and smart contracts while protecting privacy. This is not common in the current blockchain world. Most privacy public chains either take an aggressive approach (privacy first) or compromise on compliance, with few projects achieving both.
Community reactions to this direction have been quite positive. The core focus is on two aspects: whether the compliance features of the new network can attract institutional participation, and whether its practicality can truly be implemented.
Regarding privacy technology, the Phoenix transaction model used by DUSK is worth breaking down. It’s not just simple mixing or hidden addresses, but a scheme based on confidential transactions and one-time ring signatures. It can hide the sender, receiver, and transaction amount, while cryptographically ensuring transaction validity and double-spend prevention. It sounds complex, but for users, it means: transactions are completely private, yet verifiable on-chain.
More importantly, this privacy primitive has been standardized and integrated into DuskEVM, making it as easy for developers to call as using a normal API. You don’t need to be a cryptography expert to add powerful privacy features to your DeFi protocols or asset tokenization products. This significantly lowers the development barrier.
From an ecosystem perspective, this is the reason why DUSK can go far. Privacy technology itself is not valuable; what matters is how many applications are willing to build on top of it. If DuskEVM truly allows institutions and developers to use privacy features as naturally as breathing, then the competitive landscape of Layer-1 blockchains will see new variables.