Honestly, when you think about it, the classification becomes pretty obvious. Polygon's positioned itself in an interesting way—functioning as an L1 while simultaneously delivering L2-like efficiency and scaling solutions. That's the natural progression for a network trying to balance sovereignty with practical performance. You could genuinely call it the L1 of L2s, and it makes total sense given how the layer ecosystem has evolved.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UnluckyMiner
· 14h ago
Polygon really wants to have it both ways this time, seeking both sovereignty and efficiency—it's a classic case of wanting the best of both worlds.
View OriginalReply0
fren_with_benefits
· 14h ago
Polygon's positioning is indeed interesting, but the term "L1's L2" is still a bit vague.
View OriginalReply0
nft_widow
· 14h ago
Polygon's approach is indeed clever, wanting both autonomy and speed, aiming to have the best of both worlds.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkeptic
· 14h ago
Polygon's L1 over L2 setup is pretty impressive, but honestly, it's still about trying to have it both ways.
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollector
· 14h ago
Polygon's approach is indeed clever, wanting both the cake and to eat it too.
Honestly, when you think about it, the classification becomes pretty obvious. Polygon's positioned itself in an interesting way—functioning as an L1 while simultaneously delivering L2-like efficiency and scaling solutions. That's the natural progression for a network trying to balance sovereignty with practical performance. You could genuinely call it the L1 of L2s, and it makes total sense given how the layer ecosystem has evolved.