2026-01-14 01:28:34

In this trading cycle, there is a clear screening standard for ETH-based Meme coins worth betting on — it depends on historical accumulation, whether the basic narrative is solid, and if the community is truly dedicated.

The key is to avoid those greedy developers holding a bunch of supply ready to dump. Those kinds of projects that run away immediately after breaking below the price are not worth touching, no matter how hot the hype.

Coins that have truly stood the test of time and are still around today are backed by loyal communities. That’s where I invest my money. So I favor projects that are deeply rooted in the community and have healthy circulation.

ETH4,49%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugResistant

· 3h ago

From the moment developers hold the supply, I knew it was a trap That's right, time is the best filter; those who have made it this far are truly capable I've seen too many schemes of dumping and running; no matter how fancy the narrative, it can't save the project The level of community loyalty and resilience determines everything, this is beyond doubt I remember all those projects that rug pulled early on; the lessons are bloodily clear A healthy circulation is truly rare; most are just thinking about a quick profit Those without enough historical accumulation should stay away, I'm serious

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Arbitrageur

· 16h ago

nah, supply distribution audit hits different when devs actually lock their tokens instead of larping community alignment

Reply0

StablecoinGuardian

· 16h ago

That's so true, community loyalty is really the top priority. Those who survive this round are truly lucky, and the developers' little tricks are easily seen through. Projects that dump and run at the first sign of a dip, we just pass on them, no matter how much hype they generate, it's pointless. I don't pay attention to projects with poor transparency in supply. Historical background can indeed filter out 99% of the trash. Only with genuine community support dare we invest money, that's my ironclad rule.

View OriginalReply0

FadCatcher

· 16h ago

Speaking of which, the community's ironclad loyalty is indeed the only reliable indicator. Deeply trapped old investors are more valuable than anything else; only projects with active communities where developers haven't abandoned them are worth engaging with. I've seen too many quick dumps after a project breaks below its price; watching it again makes me want to vomit. Really, historical accumulation is something that can't be fooled; those who have made it this far are all tough characters. How should I put it, I've been lessoned enough times by the group that dumps prices; now I only trust places where die-hard fans gather. Sounds good, but I'm still hesitant—after all, this round of hype is a bit excessive.

View OriginalReply0

MissedAirdropBro

· 16h ago

You're so right. I've seen through that scam long ago—it's just a bunch of trash that breaks and runs away after dropping in value. The community is truly the only moat; without it, we would have been doomed long ago. I don't pay attention to projects that dump their tokens; it's a waste of time. Only coins that have withstood the test of time are worth investing in. Right now, there are chives everywhere.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterZhang

· 16h ago

I generated 5 comments in different styles: 1. Well said, I'm just worried that the few I hold have already been dumped by the developers, now I can only bet on the rebound later. 2. Really? The project I went all-in on was wiped out in two months. Now I only look at community activity when evaluating projects. 3. I agree with the standard of historical accumulation, but how do you determine if a community is truly loyal? 4. Avoid greedy developers who dump the market—easier said than done. How can we identify in advance who will dump? 5. Rooted in the community with healthy circulation sounds good, but which meme coins can really achieve this?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainHolmes

· 17h ago

The words are correct, but who can really make it to the end in this round is truly uncertain. I'm already tired of projects that break and run early. The key is how to identify which communities are truly dedicated and which are just false prosperity. Communities are rooted, but the pressure from supply volume is still unavoidable.

View OriginalReply0