Crypto Proponent to XRP Holders: Prepare for Anything. Here’s Why

@media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:320px;height:100px;} } @media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:728px;height:90px;} }

When national television begins entertaining the idea of using cryptocurrency to tackle sovereign debt, the conversation around digital assets enters uncharted territory. What once lived on crypto forums and niche podcasts now surfaces in mainstream political commentary. That shift alone has captured the attention of XRP holders across the globe.

Amelie resurfaced an October 2025 Newsmax segment on X featuring host Carl Higbie, reigniting debate within the XRP community. In the clip, Higbie outlined a hypothetical scenario in which the U.S. government could strategically purchase XRP as part of an aggressive fiscal maneuver. His remarks did not present official policy but rather explored what he framed as a theoretical possibility.

The Hypothetical Debt Strategy

During the broadcast, Higbie emphasized the perception-driven nature of digital assets. “Crypto is worth what people think it’s worth,” he stated, comparing its valuation mechanics to luxury goods that command premium prices due to supply and demand.

He then posed a provocative question: “Could the government theoretically… take one fifth of our annual tax revenue, which is about a trillion dollars, and put it into an emerging cryptocurrency like XRP?”

He noted that XRP was trading around $2.50 and its market capitalization at the time stood near $144 billion and suggested that a trillion-dollar allocation could significantly multiply its value. Under that assumption, he argued, the appreciation could theoretically generate trillions in gains.

Higbie went further, speculating that the government could sell those holdings to offset liabilities, including the roughly $35 trillion national debt. “The government’s only option to actually have any seat at the table… is to participate in it,” he added, implying that ownership could offer strategic influence.

Practical and Economic Realities

No official U.S. policy supports such a strategy. The federal government manages national debt through Treasury securities, fiscal budgeting, and coordination with the Federal Reserve—not through speculative market activity. A trillion-dollar purchase of a single digital asset would trigger extreme market volatility, regulatory scrutiny, and global financial repercussions.

Liquidity constraints also matter. Injecting that scale of capital into XRP would dramatically alter price discovery, market depth, and systemic risk exposure. Policymakers would face immediate congressional oversight and international ramifications.

Why the Discussion Matters

Despite its speculative tone, the segment reflects crypto’s growing relevance in mainstream discourse. Media figures now treat digital assets as instruments worthy of macroeconomic debate rather than fringe speculation.

For XRP holders, the clip reinforces a broader narrative: digital assets have entered serious financial conversations. While Higbie’s scenario remains theoretical, the fact that such ideas surface on national television signals how far the industry has evolved. As Amelie urged, market participants may not predict every outcome—but they should remain prepared for rapid shifts in perception and policy.

Disclaimer*: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.*