#加密资产安全风险 From on-chain data, the recent large-scale blacklisting behavior of WLFI has indeed sparked some controversy. Among the 272 addresses listed in the blacklist, 79% are related to phishing attacks, and 18.4% are users who actively reported theft. Although this approach aims to protect user assets, it inevitably raises concerns about centralized intervention.

From a security perspective, quickly freezing suspicious addresses can effectively prevent further loss of funds. However, on the other hand, if this power is misused, it may also affect the asset freedom of normal users. The key lies in whether WLFI can maintain transparency and establish a fair appeal mechanism.

Investors are advised to closely monitor the subsequent policy adjustments and specific implementation of WLFI. At the same time, regardless of the project, users should develop good security habits, such as using hardware wallets and regularly backing up private keys, to reduce the risk of asset theft. After all, in a decentralized world, asset security ultimately depends on one's own control.