The only thing in this circle that can bring me happiness is you, Sister Chuan Chuan. It has to be you, the one who makes me feel happy in this boring and dull circle. If I don’t check in on you today, I won’t smile all day long.

Last night, it dropped to 3043.29, rounding to about 3040. There’s support at the 3050 level of this chain, and support at 3030 as well. Isn’t it amazing? Did it successfully miss the 3040 level?
If you’re not convinced, come out and argue with me. Don’t tell me that the areas around 3030 are near 3040, or that the areas around 3050 are near 3040. If you use the word “near” for these two levels, then there’s a problem with the way these two levels are given. That’s a dead end. You either admit that none of these levels are correct, or admit that there was an error in giving these two levels and they should be a single level.
Pick one issue to continue this round.
Later, let’s talk about the four-hour level of 3060/3070 that you said broke. I don’t remember how much the 3030/3000/29 levels are, but the four-hour closing is right between 3060 and 3070. I won’t ask whether it broke or not; just say that for such a large timeframe, if it breaks, the next support levels at 3030 and 3000—do they break by 30 or 50 points?
I really admire you. How did you find this chain of levels? I’ve been focusing on levels below 3000. If you let me discover that the support levels below 3000 this time are different from the last time, I’ll compare them one by one. You can say that the support and resistance levels will change, but before 3000 is broken, the levels below are unchanged. Support is support. Yesterday, 2900 was support; the day after tomorrow, it won’t be support anymore. Remember this chain! I’ll quiz you next time.