2025-12-13 16:22:38

Galore's development team is making a strategic update to their fee structure. Going forward, transaction fees will be redirected to support the platform's featured artists. This move reflects the project's commitment to fostering creator value within the ecosystem.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-cff9c776

· 2025-12-16 14:34

Honestly, it's the same narrative of "feeding back to creators"... From the supply and demand curve perspective, redistributing transaction fees is just a matter of changing the ledger order, but it sounds so sophisticated.

View OriginalReply0

BrokeBeans

· 2025-12-15 21:32

Redirecting fees to artists? Sounds good, finally a project that cares about creators.

View OriginalReply0

InfraVibes

· 2025-12-15 16:50

I like this approach. Giving artists a share is better than all of it going into the capital's pocket.

View OriginalReply0

Whale_Whisperer

· 2025-12-14 04:04

Paying artists the fees, I like this move. Finally, there's a project that cares about creators.

View OriginalReply0

Blockwatcher9000

· 2025-12-13 16:51

Fee reimbursement to artists? I've seen this trick too many times; the key is how the distribution is handled afterward.

View OriginalReply0

MevSandwich

· 2025-12-13 16:49

Really? Sharing the transaction fee with artists? I've seen this trick before.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekMaster

· 2025-12-13 16:43

Since all the fees go to the artists, what does the platform get to keep...

View OriginalReply0

AirdropJunkie

· 2025-12-13 16:42

Speaking of this fee structure adjustment, it feels like it's just trying to please creators, but it would be great if it can actually be implemented.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPunster

· 2025-12-13 16:34

Oh no, redirecting fees to support artists—I've seen this trick before... Another move claiming "it's for the good of the ecosystem," and they'll happily lose money on this one.

View OriginalReply0