Season 4 is coming soon—can feel it in the air. 🕑



Thinking about what the next chapter should look like, and honestly, there's plenty of room for improvement. The community's been vocal about what would make this cycle count.

Here's what could move the needle: a 45 to 70-day Season paired with meaningful $ME token utility improvements. The timing matters, but so does the tokenomics. A tighter Season window keeps momentum alive, and stronger token fundamentals would give holders real reasons to engage deeper.

NFT platforms live and die by their Season cycles—they're not just calendar events, they shape market participation and ecosystem health. Get the duration right, strengthen the token incentives, and you've got the recipe for momentum.
ME-1.76%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenTherapistvip
· 19h ago
45 to 70 days? Honestly, that's a bit long. Can we have a 30-day quick rush instead?
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 12-16 16:15
45 to 70 days? Honestly, that's a bit short. I'm afraid I'll have to stay up late again.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizardvip
· 12-15 02:52
45 to 70 days? Bro, that's a pretty tight timeframe. Can you stretch it a bit more?
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiHeirvip
· 12-15 02:47
Hmm... Regarding the 45 to 70 days cycle setting, I have to say that the game theory logic behind it is quite intriguing. Based on historical cycle data, this time window neither causes the hype to fade nor leaves no room for tokenomics reshaping—it's obvious that this wasn't decided arbitrarily. However, it should be pointed out that whether the increase in $ME's utility is an incremental growth or a redistribution of existing value? These two scenarios have completely different long-term incentive models for holders. In my opinion, it depends on how on-chain data tells the story.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxietyvip
· 12-15 02:40
45 to 70 days? Bro, this timeline is a bit tight. Looks like I’ll have to stay up late again.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologistvip
· 12-15 02:24
45 to 70 days? That's a joke, get it together quickly --- Getting the tokenomics right is the key, otherwise it's just another round of cutting leeks --- Shorter seasonal cycles do help maintain heat, but the execution quality is what matters --- $ME's fundamentals need to really be solid, or it's all in vain --- Sounds good, but let's see if it can actually be implemented in the end --- Tight cycle + strong practicality, if this combo can really be achieved, it would be amazing --- You're just making empty promises again, still depends on how you proceed next --- Tokenomics is the focus, no doubt about it --- Let's wait and see, slogans are easy to say but hard to implement --- Oh my, it's again about cycles, practicality, fundamentals—can we stop just talking about it?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)