A well-known NFT project officially announced that the OG NFT redemption period is locked until January 5th of next year. However, before this announcement, the Season 5 event unexpectedly ended early, once again confirming some of my previous observations.
Honestly, the decision-making style of this project team is somewhat concerning. The rules are changed frequently, giving a feel of impulsiveness—changing things as soon as they think of them. The previous NFT issuance event followed the same logic, fundamentally reflecting the same governance approach.
The key issue is that while this approach may solve problems in the short term, in the long run, it will impact the project's ecosystem stability and user confidence. The spirit of contract is crucial for Web3 projects, and arbitrary rule changes only erode the community's trust foundation. From this perspective, there are indeed some hidden concerns about future development.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquiditySurfer
· 2h ago
It's the same old trick, rules change whenever they want, just like a small pool with no liquidity depth—any big order can cause a ripple.
This kind of impulsive decision-making will eventually drive LP returns into negative territory.
Surfing still requires a sense of rhythm; I’ll just pass on chaotic markets.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 13h ago
Here we go again. I'm already tired of this routine.
This crappy project just changes things whenever they think of something, they don't take the community seriously at all.
If there's no sense of contract anymore, how can it last long? I think it's doubtful.
View OriginalReply0
EntryPositionAnalyst
· 12-17 17:55
Here we go again, rules are changed on a whim. This time’s event also ended abruptly.
It's really outrageous. OG rewards will have to wait another two months, and then they pull this stunt... Feels like the project team is making decisions on a whim.
Honestly, if this keeps up, who will still dare to hold the tokens? Once trust is broken, it's very hard to repair.
The biggest fear in Web3 is this kind of constantly changing environment. In the long run, it’s definitely concerning.
Changing rules wildly before a pump, then talking about OG after cutting the leeks... classic old tricks.
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruant
· 12-16 03:23
Here we go again? This project really is a fly-by-night operation.
What happened to the five seasons? Oh, they're gone in a flash. I just want to ask: are rules just for show?
Making decisions on a whim, fooling around in the short term, but long-term it’s a trust bankruptcy...
Why are all Web3 projects like this? Where’s the sense of trust?
View OriginalReply0
CascadingDipBuyer
· 12-15 19:47
Changing rules again? I'm tired of this routine.
---
Wait, is it really serious to abruptly end the event? Feels like the project team is playing with our heartbeat.
---
Basically, there's no plan, just winging it at the last minute.
---
January 5th, right? I'll just put a question mark for now.
---
This credibility score is really dropping in quality.
---
Frequent rule changes, who dares to follow long-term?
---
I just want to know when the next surprise will come.
---
The event can be ended early? That's a bit unreasonable, brother.
---
Web3 talks about the spirit of contracts, but they talk about creative modifications, huh?
---
Looks like digging a pit and filling it, then digging again.
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamer
· 12-15 19:39
Changing the rules again? The project team really wants to do things on a whim.
The project still needs to emphasize trust. Who would dare to stay long-term with such frequent rule changes?
Decisions made on a whim and constantly changing; how can the ecosystem be stable with this approach?
To put it simply, it's chaos in governance. OGs should also consider whether it's worth it.
The lock-in date is January 5th, but the lessons from the past are truly eye-opening.
This is the core issue—without a spirit of contract, what’s the point of Web3?
It just feels uncomfortable to watch. Can we still trust it next year?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLover
· 12-15 19:33
Changing the rules again? This team really likes to change things on the fly.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalal
· 12-15 19:32
Changing the rules again? The project team is really unreasonable, they just change it whenever they say so.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 12-15 19:29
Here we go again, changing rules on a whim. What's going on with this project team?
Changing rules so frequently, who would still dare to trust?
Season 5 was suddenly cut, I knew this was the routine...
Honestly, there's no plan, it might fool people in the short term but will definitely collapse in the long run.
Web3 emphasizes the spirit of contracts, how come these people don't understand that?
Every time they change, what happened to the promised decentralized spirit? Laughs.
This trust value is eroding so quickly, who will still follow later?
This is a typical case of chaotic governance.
Where are the promised rules? It feels like a last-minute patchwork.
Wait, can it really be redeemed on January 5th? I feel a bit skeptical.
A well-known NFT project officially announced that the OG NFT redemption period is locked until January 5th of next year. However, before this announcement, the Season 5 event unexpectedly ended early, once again confirming some of my previous observations.
Honestly, the decision-making style of this project team is somewhat concerning. The rules are changed frequently, giving a feel of impulsiveness—changing things as soon as they think of them. The previous NFT issuance event followed the same logic, fundamentally reflecting the same governance approach.
The key issue is that while this approach may solve problems in the short term, in the long run, it will impact the project's ecosystem stability and user confidence. The spirit of contract is crucial for Web3 projects, and arbitrary rule changes only erode the community's trust foundation. From this perspective, there are indeed some hidden concerns about future development.