There's an interesting phenomenon. An ETF primarily invested in stocks and cash has fallen 22% this year, while during the same period, stock and cash assets performed much better than it. Ironically, the overall market environment this year has been quite good, with only 5% of ETFs experiencing negative returns, yet this fund has become one of the minority. What's even more disheartening is that this product manages less than $1 million in assets, and hardly anyone owns it.
This situation is indeed rare—investing in the most basic asset classes, yet being caught in a basic asset trap. A small scale may mean that operating costs are disproportionately high, or it could simply be an unpopular niche product that no one pays attention to. It also reminds investors that when choosing ETFs, they should consider not only the investment logic but also whether there is enough market attention and scale support.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MemecoinTrader
· 12-16 09:50
lmaooo this is literally a case study in how poor execution tanks even the most basic thesis. -22% on stocks+cash? that's not underperformance, that's social death
the <100M AUM detail is chef's kiss though... tells you everything. probably hemorrhaging on fees while nobody's watching. classic exit liquidity trap
Reply0
GasDevourer
· 12-16 09:36
Haha, this ETF is really something. The management fee probably eats up all the gains.
With a size of less than a million dollars, you still want to survive? Deserved to fail.
Choosing ETFs depends on popularity; obscure products are just traps.
Now I understand, even with proper asset allocation, you can't escape being drained.
To put it plainly, it's a worthless piece of junk that no one wants. How can there be such a terrible fund?
There's an interesting phenomenon. An ETF primarily invested in stocks and cash has fallen 22% this year, while during the same period, stock and cash assets performed much better than it. Ironically, the overall market environment this year has been quite good, with only 5% of ETFs experiencing negative returns, yet this fund has become one of the minority. What's even more disheartening is that this product manages less than $1 million in assets, and hardly anyone owns it.
This situation is indeed rare—investing in the most basic asset classes, yet being caught in a basic asset trap. A small scale may mean that operating costs are disproportionately high, or it could simply be an unpopular niche product that no one pays attention to. It also reminds investors that when choosing ETFs, they should consider not only the investment logic but also whether there is enough market attention and scale support.