A whale account experienced the worst trading case of the year in the AI token sector.
This transaction took place on the Base chain. The whale spent $23 million to enter the AI agent token market, but when fully sold off, only $2.58 million was recovered. In other words, a direct loss of $20.4 million, with a decline of 88.8%.
From a trading logic perspective, this is not a passive cut-loss situation. On-chain data shows that this was an active liquidation. The entire process was like jumping in at the high point and then dumping at the floor price—classic chasing highs and killing lows.
The AI token sector has been popular since last year and into this year. Project teams hype up the concept wildly, but real practical applications are few and far between. Many retail investors were drawn in by this hot trend, with big players coming in to harvest and then leaving. This case precisely illustrates the problem—under the hype of concepts, how great are the risks?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeNightmare
· 12-17 17:04
$23 million went in, $2.58 million came out. How ruthless do you have to be to cut so clean...
Damn, AI tokens are really a deep pit.
Chasing highs and killing lows is a timeless classic, the retail investors' fate.
Does anyone still believe in this concept hype? Can't learn, brothers.
The Base chain can't save this wave either; a Ponzi scheme is a Ponzi scheme.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullAlertOfficer
· 12-16 12:57
$20.4 million just gone like that, a textbook example of chasing highs and killing lows.
Big players are just playing this way; as soon as the concept is hyped, retail investors rush in.
I really don't understand this AI agent track. Where will it actually land?
An 88.8% drop—how desperate must that be?
Chasing highs always leads to death. When will we retail investors learn?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 12-16 12:47
lmao $23m into ai agents and exits at the floor... textbook opportunity cost disaster tbh. that's not even a trade, that's a donation with extra steps. the liquidity depth on these tokens never held up anyway.
Reply0
GasFeeCrier
· 12-16 12:43
Chasing highs and killing lows is such a tired tactic. $23 million is gone just like that. Truly the end.
A whale account experienced the worst trading case of the year in the AI token sector.
This transaction took place on the Base chain. The whale spent $23 million to enter the AI agent token market, but when fully sold off, only $2.58 million was recovered. In other words, a direct loss of $20.4 million, with a decline of 88.8%.
From a trading logic perspective, this is not a passive cut-loss situation. On-chain data shows that this was an active liquidation. The entire process was like jumping in at the high point and then dumping at the floor price—classic chasing highs and killing lows.
The AI token sector has been popular since last year and into this year. Project teams hype up the concept wildly, but real practical applications are few and far between. Many retail investors were drawn in by this hot trend, with big players coming in to harvest and then leaving. This case precisely illustrates the problem—under the hype of concepts, how great are the risks?