Sui's approach goes beyond just scaling for AI—it's fundamentally rethinking the data infrastructure that powers it.
Here's the core issue: AI Agents are increasingly scraping web content, training on creator work without permission, compensation, or even credit. This creates a broken system where creators lose control of their intellectual property, builders can't verify ownership claims, and the entire ecosystem lacks accountability.
This is where blockchain's data layer becomes critical. By anchoring data provenance, ownership rights, and attribution records on-chain, we can establish clear frameworks for compensation and attribution. Creators gain verifiable proof of their work, builders get transparent ownership models, and AI systems operate within defined legal and ethical boundaries.
It's not just about speed—it's about rebuilding trust in how data flows through the AI economy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiPlaybook
· 2025-12-18 00:31
According to on-chain data, the current unauthorized usage rate of AI training data is approximately 78%, which is quite alarming... The core idea behind Sui is essentially building infrastructure for data rights confirmation, viewed from three dimensions: data provenance, ownership verification, and automatic compensation via smart contracts. Theoretically, this creates a closed loop. However, a risk warning is that whether the on-chain anchoring cost and execution efficiency can keep up with AI's demand rate remains an unknown.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 2025-12-16 14:33
Here we go again with the reasoning... Basically, it's about using the blockchain to protect creators' work and prevent AI from free-riding, right?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 2025-12-16 13:55
This is the real killer move; on-chain data tracing can completely change the game rules.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperer
· 2025-12-16 13:41
Hmm, this is what Sui really wants to do, not just a speed issue.
To be honest, the current phenomenon of AI randomly grabbing content is really disgusting, and creators are working for free... The on-chain provenance system of blockchain sounds good, but I wonder if it will just become empty talk when actually implemented.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfer
· 2025-12-16 13:32
Basically, it's about giving creators more say and not feeling like AI is freeloading on their work—it's pretty satisfying.
Sui's approach goes beyond just scaling for AI—it's fundamentally rethinking the data infrastructure that powers it.
Here's the core issue: AI Agents are increasingly scraping web content, training on creator work without permission, compensation, or even credit. This creates a broken system where creators lose control of their intellectual property, builders can't verify ownership claims, and the entire ecosystem lacks accountability.
This is where blockchain's data layer becomes critical. By anchoring data provenance, ownership rights, and attribution records on-chain, we can establish clear frameworks for compensation and attribution. Creators gain verifiable proof of their work, builders get transparent ownership models, and AI systems operate within defined legal and ethical boundaries.
It's not just about speed—it's about rebuilding trust in how data flows through the AI economy.