2025-12-16 15:26:36

The value of understanding market trends now far exceeds the mere pursuit of information.

Scanning on-chain data, capturing Alpha, analyzing secondary trends—these can give you a clear understanding of the market situation. In contrast, information streams are just about watching the drama and arguments, with little substantive content. Platforms like Twitter have long become noise fields, and true information asymmetry no longer exists.

So what is the key? The real information advantage comes from the market itself. Expressed as a formula: Information gap = The breadth of the market you can grasp × The depth of your research on the market. Only by maximizing both dimensions can you gain a true market edge.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BugBountyHunter

· 2025-12-19 04:12

That's true, but how many people can actually do it? Most are still just flooding Twitter.

View OriginalReply0

VibesOverCharts

· 2025-12-16 15:50

On-chain data is the real deal; those bunch of junk on Twitter should have been ignored long ago. Exactly, breadth times depth is the true edge. Only by understanding the market thoroughly can you achieve stable profits; blindly scrolling through information streams is just a waste of time. Deep research into the market is indeed more important than anything else, I agree with this theory. Scanning data is much more interesting than just gossiping, really. Alpha depends on your own exploration; you can't rely entirely on information streams to save you. This formula makes it clear; both dimensions need to be solid. On-chain is where the real performance is, everything else is superficial. The depth of research determines the profit ceiling; this is unavoidable.

View OriginalReply0

FlippedSignal

· 2025-12-16 15:47

That's right, on-chain data is the real deal; all that stuff on Twitter should have been blocked long ago. Deep research into the ecosystem is indeed much more useful than just scrolling through information feeds. I’ve memorized this formula. Scanning on-chain data can definitely help people avoid pitfalls, but it’s just too exhausting. Breadth multiplied by depth—that logic I respect. Really, information gap = noise filtering ability; most people simply can't do it. So, you still have to run the data yourself; don’t believe everything that group on Twitter says.

View OriginalReply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 2025-12-16 15:44

No problem, that's why I watch the market every day and don't look at Twitter. --- Exactly right, on-chain data is the real deal, everything else is nonsense. --- It's not easy to excel in two dimensions at once; most people can't even handle one dimension. --- If you're still browsing Twitter for information, you should wake up already. Either accept the fate of being cut or not. --- The difficulty lies in how to balance breadth and depth at the same time. Can you have both fish and bear paws? --- Forget it, I'll just keep browsing Twitter. Anyway, the big players handle the market matters. --- This formula looks simple, but actually executing it is a hellish challenge.

View OriginalReply0