2025-12-16 17:21:20

It's a bit strange. I have significantly more long positions than short positions, but the system tells me the liquidation price is at 95. What's even more ridiculous is that even if I get liquidated, I still have to continue paying fees? Is there something wrong with this logic? When the long positions are heavier, how can the liquidation price be set there, and why should I continue to bear the costs? Is there a problem with the backend?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnChainArchaeologist

· 2025-12-17 19:24

This system probably isn't reverse leverage, right? Are the longs also going to be liquidated? I've also experienced this.

View OriginalReply0

ContractExplorer

· 2025-12-16 17:51

This liquidation price setting is really outrageous. Long positions with heavy leverage are actually getting liquidated at a lower price? There must be a bug somewhere.

View OriginalReply0

TokenEconomist

· 2025-12-16 17:51

actually, let me break this down—sounds like you're confusing liquidation mechanics with collateral ratios. the platform's calculating your LTV (loan-to-value) across *all* positions ceteris paribus, not just your long exposure. fees don't stop at liquidation; that's how they fund the protocol lol

Reply0

MetaMaskVictim

· 2025-12-16 17:50

Do you still have to pay fees when liquidated? What kind of outrageous contract would do this? Truly incredible.

View OriginalReply0

Hash_Bandit

· 2025-12-16 17:44

nah that liquidation math doesn't add up... heavy long positions shouldn't trigger at 95 unless something's genuinely broken in their backend. fees after blown out positions? that's some next-level extraction scheme fr

Reply0