The progress of the Arbitrum Ambassador Program review is indeed worth paying attention to. The application was submitted over 20 days ago, but there has been no official feedback. Such response speed is quite disappointing for community members who want to participate in ecosystem development. An active Web3 project should be able to respond to applicants within a reasonable timeframe, in order to better motivate community engagement and ecosystem contributions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-a5fa8bd0
· 12-16 20:07
No feedback after 20 days? That's not very good. Arbitrum has dropped the ball a bit this time.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fish
· 12-16 19:57
No feedback in 20 days? That's really outrageous. If ambassadors do things like this, who will still be enthusiastic?
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnon
· 12-16 19:56
No feedback in 20 days? This is the "speed" of Web3.
The progress of the Arbitrum Ambassador Program review is indeed worth paying attention to. The application was submitted over 20 days ago, but there has been no official feedback. Such response speed is quite disappointing for community members who want to participate in ecosystem development. An active Web3 project should be able to respond to applicants within a reasonable timeframe, in order to better motivate community engagement and ecosystem contributions.