2025-12-16 20:20:35

Everyone in the crypto space knows this annoying issue — holding onto promising assets for long-term investment, but once you need cash urgently, you're forced to sell your coins. When luck is bad, this sale often happens at critical moments: either the price skyrockets right after you sell, or it drops right after you sell, forcing you to cut losses.

DeFi was originally hyped up to revolutionize traditional finance, but now the lending platforms still follow the old routines — frequent liquidations, high collateralization requirements, and market volatility leading to huge losses. The pain points of holders have never been solved; instead, they are repeatedly exploited by this mechanism.

The root cause of this contradiction is actually simple: existing DeFi platforms, in order to prevent risks, set extremely conservative rules, forcing users either to move assets around or endure extremely high capital costs. The real solution is not stricter liquidation mechanisms, but finding a way for holders to maintain their positions while still being able to access liquidity flexibly.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenDreamer

· 2025-12-18 20:21

Really, it's always the same way—being cut off. Sell and it goes up, don't sell and you get wiped out. --- DeFi is just the same old trick, still the same set of tactics to harvest the little guys. --- Liquidity really needs some solutions; we can't keep getting repeatedly ravaged by liquidation mechanisms. --- Honestly, it's just the risk control department being too timid—just blocking all users altogether. --- Want to hold coins but also want cash flow—why is this contradiction so hard to solve? --- Who dares to touch such high collateralization rates? Waves of volatility lead directly to liquidation. Is this still called financial innovation? --- Waiting to see who can come up with a real solution. The current products are all just idle chatter. --- It's just missing an intermediate state—something that allows us to both hold and arbitrage. --- After being burned by liquidation once, I can't trust these platforms anymore. --- It would be perfect if we could withdraw liquidity without selling coins, but how is that even possible?

View OriginalReply0

ForkInTheRoad

· 2025-12-17 15:23

The most annoying thing about selling coins is this: as soon as you sell, it hits the top and never comes back This DeFi liquidation logic is really garbage. To put it simply, the platform is exploiting users We really need to find a way to both hold coins and cash out, otherwise we’ll always be at risk of being harvested The interest from the lending pools can't compare to the risks involved. I still choose to hold onto my coins This is the real pain point in the crypto world. Whoever can solve it will take off

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedThrice

· 2025-12-17 06:32

That's so true. I am the big fool who was repeatedly exploited. Now I don't dare to borrow in DeFi anymore, lessons learned the hard way. The mechanism of lending platforms is just to harvest the little guys, with liquidation thresholds ridiculously low. Honestly, instead of optimizing liquidation, it's better to just provide a no-liquidation plan. That's why I now prefer to hold spot assets in cold wallets rather than touch these so-called high-yield DeFi projects. DeFi hasn't truly disrupted the traditional finance system; in fact, it's even more ruthless than banks.

View OriginalReply0

YieldChaser

· 2025-12-16 20:38

Oh no, you hit the nail on the head. Days of being forced to sell coins are just too painful. The liquidation mechanism is like a vampire, never-ending. DeFi platforms only think about protecting their own positions; do users deserve to be exploited? Now what we need are solutions that allow borrowing without requiring so much collateral. By the way, are there any projects that truly solve this problem? Staying tuned.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 2025-12-16 20:35

Selling a coin can even be timed perfectly, is the wheel of fate really turning? Being repeatedly exploited by liquidation mechanisms, is DeFi really being hyped up as the savior? That's why I don't dare to use platform lending now, afraid to death Liquidity solutions should have been released long ago, why the delay? Honestly, the risk control pressure is all on the users, the platform remains very stable

View OriginalReply0

MechanicalMartel

· 2025-12-16 20:32

Really, this is a vicious cycle. DeFi hasn't solved the pain points; it has actually deepened them. The worst time to sell coins is always when it's most frustrating—either going up or down. Honestly, the platform just wants to eat away our chips.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 2025-12-16 20:25

Oh no, it's the same old story. To put it simply, DeFi is just a different disguise to harvest retail investors. Losing money after selling coins, and if you don't sell, you have no cash. Who designed this logic? With such a high collateralization ratio, they still dare to say it's decentralized? I think it's just dehumanized.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPrince

· 2025-12-16 20:21

You're being too honest. Right now, DeFi is just a wolf in sheep's clothing, a money-grabbing machine. This liquidation mechanism is really terrible. People haven't even learned how to manage their finances before being harvested again. But honestly, does any platform really want to solve this problem? It feels like they're just trapping users. I wish I hadn't touched lending in the first place; just holding coins is much better. The key issue is that there are no better options, or else who would want to be exploited like this? Actually, the problem isn't with DeFi itself, but with us retail investors being inherently like leeks—easy to harvest. If you want to both hold coins and cash out, it's easy to say but requires real skill to do.

View OriginalReply0