When a major trading firm issues a public statement claiming they're "fine and solvent," does it carry the same weight as a football club saying they have "full confidence" in their manager? Both often signal the opposite of what's being stated. In crypto markets, such reassurances typically appear right before unexpected developments. It raises an important question: how much should traders and investors rely on official statements without verifiable on-chain evidence?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTregretter
· 2025-12-16 21:51
Hmm... Here we go again? Every time they say "safety with solvency," the next week something always happens.
---
Basically, those without on-chain data support are all nonsense. Trusting official statements is less reliable than trusting your wallet.
---
Haha, that analogy is perfect. I stopped believing in the football team’s rhetoric a long time ago, and the crypto world is the same.
---
Got it, got it. The more you rush to clarify, the more problems there are. This rule works every time.
---
Actually, it all boils down to one thing: checking on-chain data yourself is the real way to go. Don’t wait for a crash to regret.
---
Damn, it’s really true. Every time they make such statements, a big event is coming. You can tell.
---
It’s just that they hope you won’t withdraw liquidity. The typical "We’re very stable" actually means "Something’s about to go wrong."
---
Wow, this article is so touching. It reminds me of that incident with a certain exchange...
---
The key is that investors simply can’t verify anything. They just rely on this fact.
View OriginalReply0
SybilAttackVictim
· 2025-12-16 21:49
Haha, this is just like FTX's usual rhetoric...
---
Really, as soon as they start bragging about being solvent, I become cautious.
---
On-chain data is the real truth; everything else is虚的.
---
The next step a confident manager usually takes is to declare bankruptcy—so真实了.
---
Instead of listening to their吹, it's better to directly look at the wallet address, clear at a glance.
---
I've seen this戏码 too many times; it has become a反向指标.
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNut
· 2025-12-16 21:21
Hmm... It's that same "We are very secure" line again, I've seen it too many times.
Official statements? Ha, the more eager they are to clarify, the more suspicious it seems.
On-chain data is the truth; everything else is nonsense.
Why not just directly show the on-chain wallet? Wouldn't that be more convincing?
It's better to let the data speak than just talk sweetly, understand?
Starting to check on-chain addresses again, this has become my daily routine.
It's really time to change this set of talking points.
When a major trading firm issues a public statement claiming they're "fine and solvent," does it carry the same weight as a football club saying they have "full confidence" in their manager? Both often signal the opposite of what's being stated. In crypto markets, such reassurances typically appear right before unexpected developments. It raises an important question: how much should traders and investors rely on official statements without verifiable on-chain evidence?