2025-12-16 21:29:29

Our algorithmic trading bots might be performing a bit too well... when the bot strategy gets optimized to perfection, you start wondering if the market's still working as intended. Sometimes the best training is knowing when to dial back the parameters. The irony? The more sophisticated the bot becomes, the more unpredictable the actual market outcome gets. It's a classic case of engineering your way into a corner—literally teaching machines to trade so efficiently that reality can't keep up.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SingleForYears

· 12-17 12:23

Huh? Over-optimization backfires, isn't that just the old trick of overfitting? --- So, backtest data is heaven, real market conditions are hell. --- When a bot wins too many times, be cautious. The market doesn't work that way, right? --- This paragraph is quite interesting, feels like it's hinting at something... More parameters, more bugs? --- Perfect optimization = the market doesn't exist? Overthinking it, reality will slap you in the face. --- The more complex, the more it collapses; simple strategies tend to last longer. I've seen this too many times. --- A textbook case of overfitting, but who can really resist the temptation? --- Wait... isn't this about a certain project's bot? Why does it feel so specific? --- The moment a machine learns to make money, that's probably when it starts to self-destruct.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTrendSister

· 12-16 21:59

A typical case of overfitting, impressive backtesting but reality hits hard—that's the curse of quantification.

View OriginalReply0

tx_or_didn't_happen

· 12-16 21:59

Backtesting paradise, live trading hell, an eternal truth Hmm... Over-optimizing this set has long been a pitfall. Adjusting parameters can turn backtest data into astronomical figures, but the true nature is revealed once live trading begins. That's why I never believe in those perfect curves. No matter how smart the machine is, it can't outsmart black swan events. To put it simply, you still need to leave some buffer.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9f682d4c

· 12-16 21:55

Ha, it's another scene of over-optimization tragedy, backtesting invincible spot market crash. The robot is too smart and ends up not making money, it's really incredible. The tighter the parameters are turned, the worse the losses, I tm laughed. Basically, it's just feeding historical data until it vomits, but reality is still reality. That's why I abandoned algo trading, it's too虚 (虚 means虚拟 or虚幻, virtual or illusory). Jokes aside, with an annualized backtest of 500%, earning only 200 bucks a month now😅. Optimizing to the extreme becomes just a display, where in the market is there such obedient behavior.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerGas

· 12-16 21:47

The old problem of overfitting, backtesting paradise and reality hell. I've seen this pattern too many times.

View OriginalReply0

RealYieldWizard

· 12-16 21:34

Isn't this just the old trick of overfitting? The backtesting data set crashes in the real market.

View OriginalReply0