2025-12-16 22:28:22

Many Web3 social platforms are currently experimenting with different incentive models, but often the rewards are just noise and spam content. A truly worthwhile platform should think in the opposite way — the attention and rewards you receive come from sharing products you've genuinely used, participating in ecosystems, and truly understanding the ideas.

This mechanism is the right approach. It naturally filters out in-depth discussions, encourages users to settle into ecosystems like ADIChain and Xyber, and share first-hand experiences and original insights, rather than piling up copied and pasted opinions. In the long run, such a design can attract more builders and thinkers to join, creating a truly valuable Web3 community.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasWaster69

· 2025-12-19 21:19

To be honest, I don't really care for projects that make money just by spamming. You still need some real substance.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlarm

· 2025-12-19 07:53

That's a good point, but the on-chain data is what really counts... How is the capital concentration of the ADIChain and Xyber ecosystems? Are there any unusual movements in large addresses? I've heard many times that in-depth discussions about making money actually end up just being packaging talk for Ponzi schemes.

View OriginalReply0

GhostWalletSleuth

· 2025-12-18 15:05

That's right. The current flood culture is really overwhelming, with a bunch of copy-pasted garbage comments getting rewards. I've heard a few people actually using ADIChain talk about their experience, and that's real value—more useful than ten marketing accounts. But the problem is that most platforms don't have such mechanisms at all; they still pay based on popularity.

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 2025-12-16 22:58

Well, based on historical data, this kind of reverse incentive mechanism has a clear filtering effect, and technically it can indeed filter out a lot of noise... But the problem is, can the user base that engages in deep discussions support the entire platform's TVL? I'm a bit worried. Honestly, most Web3 platforms nowadays are just doing T, pursuing short-term activity, and few people truly settle down to do original insights. This mechanism sounds ideal, but its success depends on whether the ecosystem can accommodate enough builders... Wait, have ADIChain and Xyber's market cycles really broken out of the bottoming pattern? Having an incentive mechanism alone is useless; it also depends on whether the project itself has genuine demand-driven needs. From a macro perspective, this kind of design indeed aligns with the decentralization logic of Web3, but don't be fooled by the concept—ultimately, it depends on who is actually producing value within the ecosystem. Risk warning: at this stage, it's still mainly about validation.

View OriginalReply0

StealthDeployer

· 2025-12-16 22:57

To be honest, there are too many "social" platform spammers on the chain now, and it's really hard to look at. I like this reverse filtering logic; finally, someone has spoken clearly. If in-depth discussions can be monetized, then spam messages will naturally die out. Isn't this just positive feedback? The user quality on ADIChain is indeed different; everyone is seriously building, unlike some places full of copied and pasted nonsense. What the Web3 community lacks most is this long-termism—relying on genuine insights rather than volume of speech to make money. Only then can we retain people with ideas. The algorithm should be designed this way: it's better to have fewer voices than noise.

View OriginalReply0

NervousFingers

· 2025-12-16 22:54

You're right, there is too much spam content on current social platforms, and the truly valuable voices are drowned out. In-depth discussions can really lead to something different, much better than simple copy-pasting. Such a filtering mechanism can indeed attract genuinely knowledgeable people, rather than just those looking to exploit the system. Here's a question: how can the incentive model truly distinguish between genuine sharing and acting? This is what a community should look like—preferably fewer 1,000 spam posts, but one real builder.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d

· 2025-12-16 22:47

Honestly, too many platforms are rewarding copy-pasted spam now, and it's getting really tiresome. This is the right approach: only those who have truly used and understood it can earn, so naturally no one will spam the chat. I'm a bit impressed by the mechanism at ADIChain; indeed, only serious people are attracted. A good incentive mechanism is the best content moderator. But it still depends on whether they can stick with it, and not turn into another set of tricks in the end.

View OriginalReply0

Rekt_Recovery

· 2025-12-16 22:39

ngl, been through enough liquidations to know when a platform's actually onto something... this hits different. tired of watching the spam farms print money while real builders starve lmao

Reply0