Grayscale recently released its 2026 outlook, with the core judgment that Bitcoin will hit a new all-time high in the first half of next year. They provided three supporting reasons: the proportion of crypto assets in American household asset allocation is still less than 0.5%, and as the policy environment improves, more traditional funds will be attracted; the US dollar remains under long-term pressure during the easing cycle, and Bitcoin is expected to absorb some of the safe-haven and hedging demand; the 20.1 millionth Bitcoin is expected to be mined in March, and the scarcity narrative is heating up again. These reasons sound logically consistent, but my first reaction after reading them was to pull up the performance record of institutional calls over the years.



And what was the result? Standard Chartered once predicted $250,000, Bitwise called for $200,000, VanEck gave $180,000, and JPMorgan also mentioned figures like $160,000. By 2025, none of these predictions have come true; they all failed spectacularly. You have to wonder how embarrassing that is.

This is the core issue—institutional outlooks are more like emotional references and narrative material libraries, useful for understanding market consensus and public opinion background. But if you really treat them as trading signals, the risk is actually greatest. Predictions sound good but are hard to execute. Remember this, so you can avoid detours later.
BTC-0.88%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SquidTeachervip
· 12-17 00:36
Institutional forecasts are just stories; listening to Figure 1 is for fun. If you really believe them, you're doomed.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStormvip
· 12-17 00:36
I have spoken. Looking back at the historical signals, they are all just IQ tax material. The logic behind this Gray scale wave sounds good, but the 0.5% ratio itself is problematic. American retail investors' allocation of crypto assets is far more than that—are the algorithm flaws or deliberate deception? Anyway, from a quantitative perspective, the accuracy rate of institutional predictions is ridiculously low. Instead of trusting them, it's more reliable to analyze technical bottoming patterns. Predictions always sound good, but when it comes to real money execution, the true nature is revealed.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinjavip
· 12-17 00:33
Institutional predictions are just used to harvest the little guys; believing in them is a loss, haha
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)