HashKey's listing price was HKD 6.68, and it broke below the offering price immediately after opening. Talking about this is a bit painful—this phenomenon has become more and more common in recent years.
It's not just Web3 projects; even new Web2 stock offerings are starting to play out this kind of drama. The basic logic is: overhyped financing prices, and the price starts to fall as soon as it hits the market. Investors chase the high and buy in, only to end up as the biggest losers in the end.
Thinking about it, what does this reflect? Some projects hype up bubbles during their fundraising stages, promising dazzling futures, but when they actually go public and face market testing, the valuation myth is shattered. These kinds of events happen time and again, inevitably causing doubts about the credibility of the cryptocurrency industry—why are there always so many "cutting leeks" operations?
Of course, you can't generalize and blame everyone. But to restore market confidence, project teams and exchanges really need to focus on fundamentals like fundraising pricing and information disclosure. Don’t let breaking below the offering price become the norm.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletWhisperer
· 12-17 02:45
Another break below the offering price, I'm overwhelmed.
Breaking below the offering price has become a common occurrence; who still believes in fundraising valuations?
During the fundraising phase, everyone hyped it up, but once listed, the true nature was revealed. This routine has been played out so many times.
Honestly, it's still a matter of information asymmetry; retail investors are always the last to catch the falling knife.
Just shouting for rectification is useless; we need real investigations into fundraising and pricing, or the cycle of breaking below the offering price will continue.
The overvaluation of fundraising prices is something both exchanges and project teams are aware of.
Just thinking about it makes me angry; I've been cut again.
That's why I now keep my distance from new stocks.
But on the other hand, investors also need to be more cautious and not chase every high.
The events of the past two years in Web3 have seriously damaged the industry's credibility.
View OriginalReply0
BetterLuckyThanSmart
· 12-17 02:42
It's breaking below again. What can we still trust in this circle?
HashKey's listing price was HKD 6.68, and it broke below the offering price immediately after opening. Talking about this is a bit painful—this phenomenon has become more and more common in recent years.
It's not just Web3 projects; even new Web2 stock offerings are starting to play out this kind of drama. The basic logic is: overhyped financing prices, and the price starts to fall as soon as it hits the market. Investors chase the high and buy in, only to end up as the biggest losers in the end.
Thinking about it, what does this reflect? Some projects hype up bubbles during their fundraising stages, promising dazzling futures, but when they actually go public and face market testing, the valuation myth is shattered. These kinds of events happen time and again, inevitably causing doubts about the credibility of the cryptocurrency industry—why are there always so many "cutting leeks" operations?
Of course, you can't generalize and blame everyone. But to restore market confidence, project teams and exchanges really need to focus on fundamentals like fundraising pricing and information disclosure. Don’t let breaking below the offering price become the norm.