How do Ripple's payment-focused architecture and Litecoin's peer-to-peer design stack up when examining active unique network value models? Both networks show distinct approaches to measuring on-chain vitality. Ripple emphasizes transaction throughput and validator participation across its consensus mechanism, while Litecoin focuses on mining diversity and UTXO velocity patterns. Analyzing unique active addresses, transaction frequencies, and network health indicators reveals how each protocol captures value differently. Whether you're tracking institutional adoption of XRP or Litecoin's mining ecosystem shifts, understanding these network models helps explain why market participants weight their utility propositions so differently. The metrics tell an interesting story about what 'active' truly means in each ecosystem.