The Aave community has recently taken significant action again. BGD Labs (the core team providing technical and security support for the DAO) has initiated a proposal on the governance forum to transfer Aave's brand assets. Specifically, this includes "soft assets" such as domain names, social media accounts, and naming rights, which will be transferred to a legal entity directly controlled by the DAO.



In simple terms, it means gradually divesting the branding rights originally held by Aave Labs, to be managed collectively by the DAO. This way, if a new legal entity is registered or governance structures are adjusted in the future, they will no longer be constrained by the original team's name.

From the perspective of DAO decentralization, this is indeed a logical step forward, but it also means that the boundary of authority between Aave Labs and the DAO will need to be redefined. Community discussions are expected to be intense.
AAVE-4.02%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MoonRocketTeamvip
· 12-17 04:55
Wow, this is performing an "ownership transfer operation" for Aave, directly snatching the brand rights from Labs. When it comes to power transfer, the community will argue for three days and nights. It's a bit like the final check of the supply chain before a rocket launches, ensuring the ground command can keep the helm steady. Speaking of which, the ultimate goal of DAO governance is probably like this: gradually eroding the team's influence and then achieving complete decentralization. Wait, does this mean BGD will still have the power to cause trouble in the future? It feels like the power structure is about to be reshuffled. In the long run, this move is actually the right one; in the short term, there might be some friction. No one should expect to monopolize the remote control. It has a bit of that top-tier power game vibe.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuruvip
· 12-17 04:51
Oh no, is this really serious? Is Aave Labs about to be sidelined? Power transfer sounds nice as decentralization, but honestly it’s just seizing power, interesting. BGD’s move this time is really ruthless, directly cutting off the source. But here’s the problem: can the DAO really manage these assets? I’m a bit skeptical. Feels like it’s going to be a huge fight, get your popcorn ready. True decentralization still depends on how the voting goes later; that’s the key. Is Labs really being expelled from the team like this? A bit sad. What do you all think? Is this move a step forward or shooting ourselves in the foot?
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 12-17 04:47
Another power struggle, the folks at BGD really know how to play Aave Labs probably can't stay calm now, their brand assets are being taken away, it feels a bit shady The community is about to blow up, decentralization vs actual control, an eternal contradiction BGD sounds nice, but it's really about seizing power; understanding it from another perspective isn't wrong either Will there be behind-the-scenes battles in the voting? Things aren't that simple Aave's story is getting more and more complicated, kind of like a palace intrigue drama The transfer of brand rights, what's the next step, directly sidelining Labs? Honestly, can a DAO manage a brand better than Labs? Not necessarily With so many voices, managing domain names through a DAO might be more prone to issues This proposal won't pass, Labs will definitely counteract, betting five bucks Just watch, the forum will probably tear itself apart again, I’ll grab a small stool and watch the show
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)