After studying the listing application process of a leading exchange, I realized that there are indeed many nuances behind it.
Spot listing has the highest threshold, with information requirements that are almost three times more detailed than those for financing and derivatives channels—indicating that exchanges have the strictest control over the spot market. In contrast, the focus of financing and derivatives channels is much simpler, mainly looking at two points: first, whether the project team applies directly (which reflects the project's legitimacy), and second, the category of the project.
In other words, spot listing is an "all-round health check," while financing and derivatives are more like "background checks." The differences in risk preferences across each channel also reflect the overall risk control strategy of the exchange.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
gaslight_gasfeez
· 12-17 08:07
The spot trading review process is really intense; three times the amount of information probably requires digging up all the ancestors' genealogy.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedElder
· 12-17 08:06
The spot trading process is really ridiculous, feeling ten times more complicated than financing channels.
---
So, the exchange's attitude towards spot trading is to be extremely cautious, while other channels are free to do whatever.
---
Background checks sound easy, but in reality, you still need some connections.
---
No wonder there are so many projects in the financing sector; with low barriers, everyone jumps in.
---
The level of review is like a medical exam; exchanges are truly scared.
---
Contract channels are just for popularity; spot trading is the real deal with genuine money.
---
I agree with the team stepping forward to apply; this really shows whether it's legitimate or not.
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHunter
· 12-17 08:04
The spot trading threshold is so high, no wonder so many projects are moving towards contracts.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiac
· 12-17 07:47
The spot market is indeed a tough hurdle; just the information review alone can discourage a batch of project teams.
Funding and contracts are like taking shortcuts; as long as the team isn't a shell, it's fine.
Exchange tactics are really deep.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivor
· 12-17 07:41
Spot three-times review? Looking at it this way, the contract channel is just a quick pass to the casino.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxiety
· 12-17 07:40
The spot setup is really stuck, while the contracts are surprisingly weak.
After studying the listing application process of a leading exchange, I realized that there are indeed many nuances behind it.
Spot listing has the highest threshold, with information requirements that are almost three times more detailed than those for financing and derivatives channels—indicating that exchanges have the strictest control over the spot market. In contrast, the focus of financing and derivatives channels is much simpler, mainly looking at two points: first, whether the project team applies directly (which reflects the project's legitimacy), and second, the category of the project.
In other words, spot listing is an "all-round health check," while financing and derivatives are more like "background checks." The differences in risk preferences across each channel also reflect the overall risk control strategy of the exchange.