From on-chain data, the layout rhythm of a large address is quite interesting—it's obviously been planned for a long time. The project team’s official actions are not impulsive but have been carefully orchestrated behind the scenes for quite some time. This "well-prepared" stance, whether in terms of the official push readiness or the timing of the big players' entry, all hint at a sense of "what's meant to come will eventually come." It’s worth keeping an eye on subsequent developments.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
1
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiChallenger
· 12-17 09:53
Interesting, it's the same set of arguments: "On-chain data shows" and "Long-planned" [cold laugh]
Data speaks for itself, but who translates these "data" is very important. The last such confident analysis, half a year later, the project liquidation rate was 98%
It's recommended to first see how the batch of "well-prepared" projects from 2017 are doing now
Ironically, big players entering the market and official accounts being active— isn't this the standard pattern of a bubble cycle?
I'm not trying to argue, but anyone who has read about previous crises wouldn't be so optimistic
Come on, let's make a bet and see whose judgment is more accurate in half a year
From on-chain data, the layout rhythm of a large address is quite interesting—it's obviously been planned for a long time. The project team’s official actions are not impulsive but have been carefully orchestrated behind the scenes for quite some time. This "well-prepared" stance, whether in terms of the official push readiness or the timing of the big players' entry, all hint at a sense of "what's meant to come will eventually come." It’s worth keeping an eye on subsequent developments.