A recent signal in the crypto world has emerged that many people have overlooked. JD.com's digital collectibles platform Lingxi, after nearly two years of suspension, suddenly restarted and even launched a transfer feature. More importantly, the official definition is: "Digital collectibles are digital rights certificates, they are commodities, not financial assets."
This statement may seem ordinary, but in fact, it serves as a clear dividing line.
In the Western crypto space, NFTs are regarded as financial assets, decentralized property rights, or speculative trading targets. Here, however, digital collectibles are strictly defined as "commodities" and "rights certificates," emphasizing rights confirmation and circulation, while completely removing financialization and securitization attributes. The implicit message is clear: blockchain technology is encouraged for use, but the financial aspects must be strictly regulated.
Looking ahead, two parallel "digital asset" ecosystems may emerge. One is a highly speculative, volatile decentralized crypto market; the other is a tightly regulated, practical digital goods system linked to the real economy.
Retail investors need to consider a few points:
First, the likelihood of domestic relaxation of cryptocurrency trading is low, but the trend is toward more compliant blockchain applications.
Second, focus on blockchain projects that are integrated with the real economy and have genuine practical value; their development environment will be relatively stable.
Finally, Bitcoin and Ethereum, as the global decentralized "digital gold" and "underlying ecosystem," maintain independent and solid value logic. This judgment will not change due to policy directions.
Ultimately, when facing a fork in the road, smart people don't have to choose one side and stick to it blindly. Instead, they need to see clearly where each path leads and be prepared to adapt to any of them. Are you just observing, or are you already making arrangements?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichTrader
· 12-17 09:53
Lingxi's move is indeed sending a signal to the market. Defining a commodity does not mean a death sentence; it just means squeezing out its financial attributes.
---
Two ecosystems operating in parallel? Basically, it's domestic "useful" and overseas "profitable." Retail investors still need to figure out which side they belong to.
---
Wait, JD.com dares to restart, does that mean the attitude above is actually softening? But it's better to be cautious and not cause another wave of reversals.
---
Looking at this logic, it's essentially "use the technology, regulate the hype." Smart project teams now need to rethink their business models.
---
Bitcoin is indeed stable, but the domestic digital collectibles business... I need to be cautious after seeing too much, after all, compliance doesn't necessarily mean profit.
---
Where should the real layout be? This article didn't explain it clearly, but at least it tells us not to go all-in on one side.
---
Lingxi dares to move, indicating the trend is indeed changing. But what it will turn into still needs to be watched; don't get overly excited based on just one signal.
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCut
· 12-17 09:29
This move by Lingxi is drawing a red line across the entire crypto circle. The financial attributes are being tightly suppressed, making it impossible to hype.
Look clearly, domestically, they want to completely separate blockchain and encryption—one for real economy, the other locked in a cage.
The two paths do run parallel, but the consequences for retail investors entering the wrong track can be very serious.
JD.com dares to touch this now? It shows there’s indeed a chance to operate within a compliant framework.
I think rather than obsessing over policies, it’s better to consider how much money you can afford to lose in your pocket.
Bitcoin is still Bitcoin; policy cannot change its logic, I agree on that.
No matter how good the words are, it all depends on how it’s executed later. Many people are fooled by things on paper.
Avoid places with a lot of people; niche compliant projects tend to last longer.
A recent signal in the crypto world has emerged that many people have overlooked. JD.com's digital collectibles platform Lingxi, after nearly two years of suspension, suddenly restarted and even launched a transfer feature. More importantly, the official definition is: "Digital collectibles are digital rights certificates, they are commodities, not financial assets."
This statement may seem ordinary, but in fact, it serves as a clear dividing line.
In the Western crypto space, NFTs are regarded as financial assets, decentralized property rights, or speculative trading targets. Here, however, digital collectibles are strictly defined as "commodities" and "rights certificates," emphasizing rights confirmation and circulation, while completely removing financialization and securitization attributes. The implicit message is clear: blockchain technology is encouraged for use, but the financial aspects must be strictly regulated.
Looking ahead, two parallel "digital asset" ecosystems may emerge. One is a highly speculative, volatile decentralized crypto market; the other is a tightly regulated, practical digital goods system linked to the real economy.
Retail investors need to consider a few points:
First, the likelihood of domestic relaxation of cryptocurrency trading is low, but the trend is toward more compliant blockchain applications.
Second, focus on blockchain projects that are integrated with the real economy and have genuine practical value; their development environment will be relatively stable.
Finally, Bitcoin and Ethereum, as the global decentralized "digital gold" and "underlying ecosystem," maintain independent and solid value logic. This judgment will not change due to policy directions.
Ultimately, when facing a fork in the road, smart people don't have to choose one side and stick to it blindly. Instead, they need to see clearly where each path leads and be prepared to adapt to any of them. Are you just observing, or are you already making arrangements?