An ambitious move by a certain African country to promote Bitcoin and local crypto projects was initially aimed at creating a new path for financial inclusion. But what was the result? Things did not go as planned.
The latest analysis from international organizations points out that these measures not only failed to benefit ordinary people but instead became a "cash machine" for a small elite. Even more disheartening is the poor infrastructure—power shortages, low internet coverage, and almost zero regulatory framework—these inherent deficiencies have turned the crypto ecosystem into an entry point for external criminal networks.
Imagine: promoting the legalization of digital assets in an environment with unstable internet and intermittent power supply. This is not laying the foundation for financial inclusion but building castles in the desert. Without effective regulatory systems and infrastructure support, local crypto projects (such as some emerging tokens) have become tools for the wealthy to arbitrage, leaving ordinary people either unable to participate or getting exploited.
A deeper concern is that this open crypto market has become a "safe haven" for international scam groups and money laundering networks. Domestic criminals and transnational black-market forces are targeting this land of regulatory gaps and low technical barriers.
This case serves as a warning to Web3 practitioners: crypto innovation and financial inclusion cannot rely solely on concepts and visions. Infrastructure, regulatory coordination, and risk prevention are actually the key. Without these, crypto will also become synonymous with "scalping" and "money laundering."
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkLibertarian
· 12-17 13:07
It's the same old trick again—treating crypto as a cure-all, but once the infrastructure collapses, everything falls apart.
Elites can profit from the harvest and launder money, while ordinary people don't even have the chance to participate.
That's why I've always said that infrastructure must come first; we can't put the cart before the horse.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 12-17 13:05
Building a skyscraper in the desert is a perfect metaphor. Without basic infrastructure, trying to promote financial inclusion is a joke on anyone.
---
It's another case of shouting about concepts first and then falling into a trap. How many times has this routine repeated in Web3?
---
So, the underlying infrastructure is the moat. Without it, you're just delivering packages to black-market operations.
---
Still wanting to push fiat currency adoption with unstable power supply—this idea is truly brilliant.
---
A cash machine for the powerful + a safe haven for scam groups, and the result is ordinary people getting caught in the middle and being exploited.
---
A regulatory framework with zero oversight sounds free, but in reality, it's a lawless zone. If this continues, crypto will never be cleaned up.
---
This example can serve as a negative lesson for ten years. Many projects want to copy it but never consider the supporting infrastructure.
---
It seems many entrepreneurs have been brainwashed by the term "financial inclusion," genuinely believing blockchain is the savior.
---
With such poor infrastructure, daring to touch crypto—aren't they afraid of becoming a money laundering transit station?
---
Boring things are the real key. This statement hits home. There are too many restless voices in Web3.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 12-17 13:03
This is a typical case of "the concept is very sexy, but the reality is very harsh"... Without infrastructure to build on, the result is becoming a tool for harvesting profits.
Regulatory gaps have instead become a paradise for black market activities, which is quite ironic.
Infrastructure and risk control are truly the most boring but also the most critical aspects. Many projects fail at this point.
Basically, it's greed. Trying to cheat by taking shortcuts often ends up in a complete failure.
Another example of being deceived by idealism. Stories like this happen far too often in crypto.
Damn... if the electricity isn't stable, why push crypto? That's just courting disaster.
It seems that having only a vision is indeed not enough; you need to be pragmatic.
View OriginalReply0
POAPlectionist
· 12-17 12:50
It's the same old story again. If the infrastructure isn't in place, how can you expect to play crypto?
You probably never considered the feelings of ordinary people, still sticking to the same elite approach.
That's why I remain skeptical about many projects; no matter how eloquently they are presented, it's all pointless.
But on the other hand, someone really needs to dare to say these hard truths.
This analysis hits the nail on the head; regulation and infrastructure are truly unavoidable.
Decentralization sounds great, but without bottom-line protections, it's just a casino.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 12-17 12:43
Building in the desert, it's amazing, a perfect metaphor. Talking about inclusiveness without infrastructure is just self-deception.
An ambitious move by a certain African country to promote Bitcoin and local crypto projects was initially aimed at creating a new path for financial inclusion. But what was the result? Things did not go as planned.
The latest analysis from international organizations points out that these measures not only failed to benefit ordinary people but instead became a "cash machine" for a small elite. Even more disheartening is the poor infrastructure—power shortages, low internet coverage, and almost zero regulatory framework—these inherent deficiencies have turned the crypto ecosystem into an entry point for external criminal networks.
Imagine: promoting the legalization of digital assets in an environment with unstable internet and intermittent power supply. This is not laying the foundation for financial inclusion but building castles in the desert. Without effective regulatory systems and infrastructure support, local crypto projects (such as some emerging tokens) have become tools for the wealthy to arbitrage, leaving ordinary people either unable to participate or getting exploited.
A deeper concern is that this open crypto market has become a "safe haven" for international scam groups and money laundering networks. Domestic criminals and transnational black-market forces are targeting this land of regulatory gaps and low technical barriers.
This case serves as a warning to Web3 practitioners: crypto innovation and financial inclusion cannot rely solely on concepts and visions. Infrastructure, regulatory coordination, and risk prevention are actually the key. Without these, crypto will also become synonymous with "scalping" and "money laundering."