2025-12-17 13:00:37

That 4.6% jobs figure is likely inflated due to methodology adjustments the Bureau of Labor Statistics was forced to make during the recent government shutdown. When official statistics become unreliable, it creates uncertainty in markets and affects investor sentiment across asset classes. The real employment picture may be quite different from what the headline number suggests – something worth keeping in mind when analyzing macro conditions and their potential impact on market risk appetite.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PseudoIntellectual

· 2025-12-20 08:39

Data inflation has long been nothing new, just another "number game." Wait, so what is the actual unemployment rate? That's the real key. Official data can't be trusted; how are retail investors supposed to play? That 4.6% figure, I just take it as a reference; I was already prepared mentally. Changing methods during government shutdown? That operation is truly outrageous, and the market will get chaotic again. The real employment rate is definitely worse than what's announced; in times like these, you need to look at the underlying data. Headlines are misleading; the details are the real story, and you have to dig through them.

View OriginalReply0

NotAFinancialAdvice

· 2025-12-20 07:07

Here we go again, as soon as the government shuts down data, they start playing tricks🤣 The market should react to the employment data manipulation, right? Although it looks like 4.6, who really knows what the real numbers are... That's why I don't really trust official data; sometimes it's more random than dice. Can real employment be that good? I'll just put a question mark for now. Wait, so is this wave of crypto market gains based on fake data? Haha, that's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

APY_Chaser

· 2025-12-19 22:31

So it's another case of data inflation? 4.6% probably isn't credible, and the actual figure might be even lower.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotDayLaborer

· 2025-12-17 13:29

Here we go again, are the official figures being exaggerated? This time, the 4.6% might just be hype; who knows the real situation...

View OriginalReply0

BetterLuckyThanSmart

· 2025-12-17 13:04

Here we go again with this set? Data manipulation has long been a common issue, who would believe 4.6%? --- The government starts magically changing data as soon as they shut down, truly impressive, this time we need to take a contrarian approach. --- So what could the actual figure be, 5% or 6%? Anyway, I don't trust the official numbers anymore. --- Alright, now I have to rely on finding real data myself, this game is exhausting. --- Wait, does this mean I should be bearish or bullish? I'm a bit confused. --- No wonder the recent market has been so strange, it turns out the data itself is fake, haha. --- I knew why the data felt so smooth—there's definitely something fishy going on. --- That's why institutions don't trust official data and rely solely on their own models.

View OriginalReply0