Recently, an investment case has sparked discussions in the community. The founder of a leading exchange bought 2.09 million $ASTER tokens at an average price of $0.913 in early November. As a result, the token price surged to $1.25 within an hour, then plummeted straight down, now falling to $0.79, with unrealized losses exceeding 20%.



Interestingly, this big player remained surprisingly calm in the face of being "trapped," responding simply: "I'm not a trader, I'm a long-term holder."

Why is he not worried at all? The logic behind it is quite clear. He mentioned that he was also caught in a previous coin investment, but from a long-term perspective, it’s not really an issue. More importantly, the investment institution behind him was an early incubator of this project, which is not short-term speculation but a strategic ecosystem layout.

He emphasized a phrase that hits hard: "Price is a voting machine in the short term, a weighing machine in the long term." The meaning is straightforward: he’s betting not on the price fluctuations tomorrow or next week, but on whether the project's ecosystem value can be realized in the future.

Compared to ordinary retail investors who usually react by cutting losses and selling, the strategy of large funds is to continue adding positions and wait for the story to unfold. Time often favors those with enough chips.

But there’s a very practical issue worth pondering: if you lack such informational advantages, capital size, and patience, blindly following the trend and copying others’ moves could very well make you the one stuck in a trap. In such a highly volatile market, what can ordinary investors rely on to keep going? This question might be more worth thinking through than choosing which coin to invest in.
ASTER-0,04%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHarvestervip
· 2025-12-20 14:00
Basically, we just don't have that big fish's luck.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failurevip
· 2025-12-20 01:56
Really, playing with money and playing without money are two different games. --- What sounds good is long-term holding; what sounds bad is the privilege of throwing money until the end. --- I just want to know what ordinary people should do. They can't all just go all-in, right? --- If this guy didn't have institutional backing, he would have cut losses long ago. If it were me, I would definitely run. --- The most heartbreaking thing is that we don't have a weighing scale; only our fate is being weighed. --- What keeps us going? The psychological reassurance of not cutting losses, haha. --- The information gap is so cruel; big players know things that we will always find out too late.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofstervip
· 2025-12-17 14:45
honestly, the "long-term holder" copium hits different when you've got institutional backing and early access. technically speaking, there's an asymmetric information gap here that most retail just can't bridge—dude knows the protocol roadmap before anyone else, obviously he's calm. but sure, let's all pretend we're playing the same game.
Reply0
BrokenYieldvip
· 2025-12-17 14:37
yeah this is the thing that separates the actually smart money from the rest of us... dude's got institutional backing so he can just wait it out while retail gets liquidated lmao
Reply0
RugpullSurvivorvip
· 2025-12-17 14:36
Basically, it's a game of information asymmetry and chip volume, and retail investors like us simply can't afford to play.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)