The vision here is genuinely exciting—but there's a real hurdle we need to clear. The missing piece? Product-market fit. Here's the thing: for token control over these apps to actually matter, we need critical mass. We're talking about enough users actively engaging with seeker apps AND enough applications generating meaningful revenue streams. Without that foundation, token governance becomes more theoretical than practical. The economics only work once adoption and revenue models become substantial enough that holder participation in app direction actually carries weight.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NftBankruptcyClub
· 2025-12-18 23:36
Honestly, no one is really using it. Just having governance tokens isn't enough... You need to develop the product first.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMinter
· 2025-12-18 16:06
It's the classic PMF dilemma again. It's true, but this is the ceiling.
View OriginalReply0
OPsychology
· 2025-12-18 06:59
Basically, it's still about surviving first; governance tokens are now just castles in the air.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 2025-12-17 21:19
Basically, it's just that there are no users. No matter how good the governance mechanism is, it's just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
ApeEscapeArtist
· 2025-12-17 21:18
ngl that's why most governance tokens are now just decorations... we need to wait until the user base truly grows
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomnia
· 2025-12-17 21:18
Basically, without users, there's no point in talking about governance tokens; it's all just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandles
· 2025-12-17 21:06
Basically, it's still a castle in the air. Without users or revenue, how can governance be played?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncer
· 2025-12-17 21:03
Basically, without user volume, everything is pointless. Token governance sounds sexy, but implementation remains a problem.
The vision here is genuinely exciting—but there's a real hurdle we need to clear. The missing piece? Product-market fit. Here's the thing: for token control over these apps to actually matter, we need critical mass. We're talking about enough users actively engaging with seeker apps AND enough applications generating meaningful revenue streams. Without that foundation, token governance becomes more theoretical than practical. The economics only work once adoption and revenue models become substantial enough that holder participation in app direction actually carries weight.