A phenomenon worth noting: even leading participants in the crypto and AI fields find it difficult to reach consensus on technological directions like Qubic and Oracle machines. This cognitive gap itself highlights the core issue—when industry-recognized authoritative voices are still speaking different words, standardization and unified understanding are far from easy. These communication details precisely reflect the significant gap that still exists in technological cognition within the entire ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainBrokenPromise
· 2025-12-17 21:49
Top players are arguing, how can there be any consensus?
View OriginalReply0
NeonCollector
· 2025-12-17 21:48
This is outrageous. Even the experts can't figure it out. What should we small investors do?
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviser
· 2025-12-17 21:47
The head can't even be unified, how to handle the underlying?
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeek
· 2025-12-17 21:32
There's no consensus at the top... This just shows that the Qubic system is still far off, don't be blinded by the hype.
A phenomenon worth noting: even leading participants in the crypto and AI fields find it difficult to reach consensus on technological directions like Qubic and Oracle machines. This cognitive gap itself highlights the core issue—when industry-recognized authoritative voices are still speaking different words, standardization and unified understanding are far from easy. These communication details precisely reflect the significant gap that still exists in technological cognition within the entire ecosystem.